Extracts From Letters Received in Regard to the “Liberty” Magazine
“I AGREE with you entirely as to the importance of constant watchfulness to prevent any encroachment on our great doctrine of religious liberty.”—Senator Miles Poindexter, of Washington. “I have been receiving the Liberty magazine right along. I have always opposed Sunday legislation, and expect to continue to oppose it as long as I remain in Congress.”—Representative Julius Kahn, of California. “Your current number of the Liberty magazine for the first quarter of 1915 is so good that I read nearly every part of it before stopping. Wish I were able to pay for and send out a large club.”—S. H. Carnahan, of Cuba. “I have received the issue of the Liberty magazine for the first quarter of 1915, and have read it with much interest. I believe it is the finest number you have put out, and undoubtedly it will do a great deal of good.”—W. H. Thurston, president of the Wisconsin Conference. “I beg to say that I have received the copy of the Liberty magazine for the first quarter of 1915, and I have also been receiving the same heretofore, but not regularly. I may say with entire frankness that I have read regularly such copies of the magazine as have reached me heretofore.”—Representative John Small, of North Carolina. Elder C. F. McVagh, president of the West Michigan Conference, writes: “You have put out a more than usually attractive number of the Liberty magazine, and I feel that it will be read. We are doing altogether too little for the lawyers and judges, and I trust that this magazine will enlighten many honest souls. Our conference executive committee has very willingly voted that the Liberty should be sent to these men.” “I have received the copy of the Liberty magazine to which you refer, and have frequently received copies thereof, which I have examined with great interest. Thank you for the courtesy of sending them to us. However, it is not necessary for you to send me the magazine to read the excellent articles therein, in order that I may be of your way of thinking about Sunday legislation.”—Representative E. A. Hayes, of California.