Your ShelfYour Projects

The New Plan

4%

Review and Herald Publishing Association · Washington, D. C. · Apr 13, 1905

FromReview and Herald, Vol. 82, No. 15.

Read the full edition

The New Plan

ARRANGEMENTS have been made for the REVIEW to contain the reports of the coming General Conference, and on account of the extra expense involved in the necessary enlargement of the REVIEW to contain these reports and other important matter in connection with the conference, the two and four months' subscriptions will be discontinued from April 1 to June 30, and the price of the three months' subscription increased to fifty cents, except to present paid subscribers whose subscription may expire before June 30. To these, the regular three months' subscription rate will be continued. The General Conference REVIEW rates will, therefore, be as follows:—
Twelve months, $1.50; eight months, $1; six months, 75 cents; three months (April 1 to June 30), 50 cents.
No individual interested in the work of the denomination can afford to be without the REVIEW at any time, and especially for the next six months.

The Plan Approved

The plan providing for the publishing of the reports of the proceedings of the General Conference in the REVIEW has met with the general approval of the people, and the following voluntary expressions copied from some of the letters from conference presidents reveal how they regard it:—
“I think the plan of having the REVIEW AND HERALD the news bearer from the General Conference to the people is a splendid one. “URBANUS BENDER, “Pres. Arkansas Conf.”
“All things considered, I think the publishing of the proceedings of the General Conference in the REVIEW the better. “URBANUS BENDER, “Pres. S. D. Conf.”
“I like the plan very much. “F. M. BURG, “Pres. Western Oregon Conf.”
“I am very highly pleased with the plan; am sure it will serve our people better than any past arrangement. “WM. COVERT, “Pres. Wisconsin Conf.”
“I can say the plan meets my mind exactly. “C. H. EDWARDS, “Pres. Greater New York Conf.”
“From the very first time I understood the plan, it met with my hearty approval, and we accept it with thanks. “A. G. HAUGHEY, “Pres. West Michigan Conf.”
“I favor the plan of putting the conference proceedings in the REVIEW. “S. G. HUNTINGTON, “Pres. West Virginia Conf.”
“I most heartily approve of the plan, and am glad the REVIEW will contain the reports this year. “R. D. HOTTEL, “Pres. Virginia Conf.”
“I am pleased with the plan. “R. M. KILGORE, “Pres. Georgia Conf.”
“I am much pleased with the plan of reporting the proceedings of the General Conference in the REVIEW exclusively. “C. E. KNIGHT, “Pres. Arizona Conf.”
“The plan meets my approval. “R. C. PORTER, “Pres. Missouri Conf.”
“I am much pleased with the plan. I remember when the reports of the conference were published in the REVIEW, and the people liked it. “J. M. REES, “Pres. Southern Illinois Conf.”
“I think the plan to be just the right one. “A. T. ROBINSON, “Pres. Nebraska Conf.”
“I approve of the plan. It is a happy thought, and it is the right move. “C. McREYNOLDS, “Pres. Kansas Conf.”
“Considering all the phases of the question the reports in the REVIEW will be the best way. “CLARENCE SANTEE, “Pres. Southern California Conf.”
“We favor the plan, and believe it will have a good effect. “H. S. SHAW, “Pres. Minnesota Conf.”
“I am very much pleased with the plan, and believe it will be the means of accomplishing much more good for ourbrethren and for the cause in general than to publish the reports in the form of a bulletin. “W. J. STONE, “Pres. Indiana Conf.”
“I acquiesce in the plan. “W. H. THURSTON, “Pres. Canadian Union Conf.”
“I am much pleased to learn that the proceedings of the General Conference will be printed in the REVIEW. “S. E. WRIGHT, “Pres. Northern Michigan Conf.”
This entire issue of the REVIEW could not contain the expressions approving the plan of publishing the report of the conference in the REVIEW, coming from members of the churches located in all sections of the country.
PUBLISHERS.