An Attack Upon God

13%

Review and Herald Publishing Association · Takoma Park Station, Washington, D. C. · Oct 24, 1912

FromReview and Herald, Vol. 89, No. 43.

Read the full edition

An Attack Upon God

Our Lord, in foreshadowing the dissensions that would exist in the world because of the teaching of the truth, declared to his disciples, and through them to us, that “a man’s foes shall be they of his own household.” There are no more bitter or disheartening feuds than those which spring up in one’s own family. There is no one who can so soon and so disastrously undermine the good name and influence of a family as one brought up under the family roof.
We know this to be true of earthly families. It is equally true of the family of the household of God. Foes in thehousehold of heaven caused a multitude of the heavenly host to be thrown under chains of darkness and sentence of death. The key-note of that dissension, that enmity, was pride, and the passing of creature judgment upon creative words and works. The creature exalted himself to the place of judge, and in the presence of his associates sat in judgment upon the Creator and Judge of all the universe. He created dissension by calling in question the righteousness and truth (infallibility) of God. Then came in swift succession the fall of the angels, the fall of man, and the launching of God’s plan for the redemption of man.
But now eminent men, bearing the name Christian, declare to us, “Man is not fallen nor falling;” the Bible is “the masterpiece of ancient literature; inspired, but not infallible.”
Here is a direct contradiction of God’s whole work and purpose concerning man. If man is not fallen, he certainly needs no savior. Consequently, Emmanuel, who was to “save his people from their sins,” becomes to them a historical myth, and the story of his sufferings for man’s redemption becomes merely a sad, sweet fable. He who will not believe that he has fallen from the high estate in which God placed him, can never see the necessity for the deep heart work required to make him a child of God, nor for the intercession in his behalf of the great Mediator between God and man. The declaration that man is not fallen strikes at the very root of the gospel work, and that is the purpose of him who inspired men to make it.
And that other declaration, that the Word of God is “inspired, but not infallible,” is the reiteration on earth of Satan’s challenge to God in heaven. When man sets himself up as a judge of the words and works of God, the rebellion in heaven is reproduced in the earth. It is a sorrowful spectacle to see fallible mortals, finite wisdom, sitting in sober criticism upon the wisdom and infallibility of the Wonderful Counselor, the Everlasting Father, the Prince of Peace, and taking upon themselves the task of sifting the Word to separate its chaff from its wheat.
When we stop to consider it, it is a terrible charge which the critics have brought against God in the declaration that his Word is “inspired, but not infallible.” That would make God the inspirer of that which is fallible, faulty, false; for it is only the infallible that is certain and sure. To admit that a thing is fallible, is to admit that it may be false, and probably is, either in whole or in part. Then the makers of that charge are stating to the world that what God has inspired is faulty, and may be false in whole or in part. Surely the adversary of souls has not brought any stronger accusation against God than that. Is it too much to say that there are foes in the household of God, the church? Is it too much to say that the work which such are doing is not the work of God? It is a solemn thing to make the charge. But it is a more solemn thing to be doing that work. The true child of God, whose heart has been touched and regenerated by the hand of God till all rebellion has been taken out of it, will not allow the work of this foe to sever him from the true family of God. But it must be borne in mind that when we take sides with those who deny the infallibility of God’s Word, we become partakers with those who charge God with inspiring that which is untrue; who accuse God of giving to the people of this world a book to direct them in the path of truth and righteousness which is itself untrue in part, and has not pointed out to us what is true and what is untrue that we might know how to distinguish the true from the false in his own book. Truly, such an accusation could be inspired only by the prince of darkness; and when we make that charge against God, we place ourselves in the ranks of the adversary.
C. M. S.