Review Testimony Meeting-No. 10

Seventh-day Adventist Publishing Association · Battle Creek, Mich. · Jun 26, 1900

REVIEW TESTIMONY MEETING.—NO. 10.

—, Mo., Jan. 31, 1900. Please find inclosed a postal order for $1.50, to pay for another year's subscription for that much-appreciated paper, the REVIEW. I look for it as much as for my daily bread; for, in fact, the matter it contains is my daily bread, and I could not get along without it. I will try to be more punctual in renewing, next time. W. W. KNICKERBOCKER.

—, Wis., Feb. 1, 1900. I love the REVIEW dearly. I have taken it since 1892, all but one year of my Christian life, and I can not do without it. MRS. LIZZIE LEWIS.

—, Kan., Feb. 2, 1900. Inclosed find $1.50, for the REVIEW for one year. I can not get along without it, and can hardly wait until it comes each week. I would sooner do without any other paper. ANDREW ZENDNER.

—, Mich., Feb. 23, 1900. My REVIEW subscription has expired. I am thankful you have continued it. Please send it right along, and I will send the money just as soon as I can. I can not get along without it. W. L. HAGEL.

—, Kan., Feb. 14, 1900. I inclose $1.75, for the REVIEW and Life Boat, one year. I enjoy reading both these periodicals, and look forward with interest to their visits. They get better and better all the time. MRS. LOUISA DALLAS.

—, Iowa, Jan. 22, 1900. The lessons in Galatians have done me much good. I read the REVIEW, and then give it to others to read. Some are becoming interested. Do you remember seeing me at the Health Institute, as it was then called, thirty-one years ago? I was there four months. T. H. CRAIG.

—, Iowa, Aug. 27, 1899. I am a constant reader of the REVIEW. I live at home with my father and mother, and they have taken the paper for a number of years; in fact, they took it several years before they became Adventists and united with the church. G. W. STAHL.

—, Tex., Sept. 3, 1899. I can not afford to be without the paper. Each department increases in interest. May the dear Lord continue to bless it in its noble mission, and give heavenly wisdom to direct in its important message. ELISHA TAYLOR.

—, Pa., Jan. 28, 1900. For some reason I failed to get the REVIEW for January 16, No. 3. I can not get along without it; must not lose one of the continued articles, nor, in fact, any of the rest. The dear REVIEW is the most precious thing I have, except the Bible. Will you please send the missing number? MRS. S. D. HOUSLER.

—, Ore., Feb. 25, 1900. I know of but one or two Seventh-day Adventist families in my district that do not have the REVIEW. Thanks for those good articles on the Messages. I have just finished reading your second one on the Fall of Babylon. It is good. The Lord must surely have helped you in its study and writing. JOHN M. COLE.

—, Mass., May 10, 1900. The REVIEW is like a dear friend. It gives me much comfort and encouragement. For twenty-five years I have been a reader of its pages. When loved ones were around me in the dear family circle, we highly prized its visits; and now, in loneliness and sorrow, it is doubly welcome. MRS. E. M. PAGE.

—, Ill., May 9, 1900. I feel now, and have felt for some time, that it is not a safe thing to do without the REVIEW. In the last six months, things have occurred right here that would have taken me by surprise, had I not had the benefit of the instruction found in that paper. And I now deny myself of necessary articles of clothing, in order to renew my subscription. I will not be without the REVIEW as long as the management will take a 25-cent subscription. A. O. HANDLEY.

—, Neb., May 7, 1900. I see that my subscription has nearly expired. I can not do without the REVIEW. I am an invalid, and read a great deal, but am poor; can send but 25 cents now; but hope, when the time has expired, to have more money. HANNAH CHAPIN.

—, Iowa, May 11, 1900. Inclosed please find 75 cents, for the REVIEW to be sent six months to Mrs. —. Have her subscription begin with May 1, as that issue contains the article written by Elder Clarence Santee, about “The First Day of the Week in the New Testament,” and that is just what I want her to have. These papers contain so many precious truths that I am at a loss, sometimes, to know to whom to give them so that they will do the most good. MRS. C. H. TYRRELL.

—, Mo., May 29, 1900. I renew my subscription to the REVIEW. Have taken it for nearly thirty years, and prize its weekly visits very much. In fact, I can not do without it. ELECTA L. HORN.

—, Ill., May 10, 1900. Please find inclosed $1.50, for the REVIEW. I can get along without any other paper better than without the REVIEW. I must have the Old Reliable, if I go without something else. It is “meat in due season.” W. W. CHURCH.

—, Oal., May 7, 1900. Inclosed find 50 cents to continue my subscription to the REVIEW, from the time of its expiration, May 29, 1900. The REVIEW has not lost its savor. MRS. A. C. BAINBRIDGE.

—, S. D., April 10, 1900. I see, by the label, that my subscription expires in May. I do not wish to miss a copy, it is so dear to me. I bless God that he has raised up men to print so good a paper. I spend many happy hours reading its pages, and only wish there were more of them. MRS. HANNAH BARKER.

—, Ohio, April 11, 1900. I do not want to miss one copy. Inclosed find order for 75 cents, for the REVIEW, six months. MRS. H. RATHBURN.

—, Ohio, April 10, 1900. I have taken the REVIEW for about ten years. The isolated Sabbath-keeper can not afford to do without it. Inclosed please find post-office order for $1.50, to renew my subscription. MRS. H. E. BLAKESLEE.

EDITORIAL ROOMS, Signs of the Times, OAKLAND, CAL., May 27, 1900. We are all glad to get the REVIEW each week as it comes, and think it is getting better and better all the time. A. O. TAIT, Asst. Ed.

—, Mo., April 12, 1900. I inclose 50 cents, for the REVIEW, for four months. I am one of the lone ones, and feel that I greatly need the paper. R. M. BEST.

—, Ohio, April 15, 1900. I am aware that my time for the REVIEW has expired, but please don't stop it. I can remit between the first and the middle of May. As the weather is getting warmer, I wish to get others to take the REVIEW, if only for a few months. I think the paper is excellent. I do not wish to be without it at all. O. P. HYER.

—, Kan., May 14, 1900. Please find inclosed $1.50, to renew my subscription for the REVIEW, for one year. I find it “meat in due season.” MRS. S. M. OLDSON.

—, Iowa, May 1, 1900. Inclosed find $1.50, for which please send the REVIEW for one year. Excuse me for not ordering sooner. I do not wish to miss a number. I can not do without the good REVIEW. E. J. GREEN.

—, N. Y., April 29, 1900. Inclosed please find post-office order for $1, for which send the REVIEW to the following four addresses, for two months each, that they may have a taste of the truth contained in its pages. I know of no better way than that I can spend a dollar. My heart longs to do more. MRS. E. A. KEARN.

—, Ill., May 1, 1900. Inclosed please find $1.75, for subscriptions—$1.50 for myself, and 25 cents for Mrs. —. I have taken the REVIEW for about twenty years, and intend to take it as long as I live. I am in my sixty-ninth year. MRS. MARTHA MCDOWELL.

—, Tex., May 17, 1900. Find inclosed subscription for the REVIEW. I can not very well do without it, especially at present, when its pages are illumined with streams of light, enjoining present duty upon those who would be saved. GEO. GRAHAM.

—, Ill., May 7, 1900. I like the REVIEW much better than any paper I have ever read. I am one of the lonely ones. MRS. N. A. SMITH.

—, Ohio, May 15, 1900. Inclosed find $1.50, for which please renew my subscription to the REVIEW. I can not get along without it. CHAS. C. BLOTT.

—, Mo., May 15, 1900. I inclose $1.50 for one-year's subscription. Have been reading this home preacher for a long time, and can not do without it. If I were to stop reading the REVIEW, I would soon lose sight of the message. The paper seems to get better all the time. ROBERT BRITTAIN.

—, N. Y., May 14, 1900. Inclosed you will find $1 toward the REVIEW subscription. I can not do without the good paper, even if I have to go without something else. MRS. ALMEDA ALLEN.

—, Ore., May 10, 1900. I can't see how to do without the REVIEW. Inclosed you will find post-office order for $1.50, to renew my subscription. L. S. JOHNSON.

—, Pa., May 9, 1900. Please forward the REVIEW, my “best companion” outside of God's word, to —. I find much comfort in its pages. MRS. M. F. THIMBLETHWAITE.

—, Ore., April 27, 1900. Please send our paper to —, Ore., instead of —. We can't get along without the REVIEW. FRED DIEDERICHS.

—, N. Y., May 7, 1900. Inclosed find 75 cents, for the REVIEW for six months. I can not get along without it. You are doing a noble work. FRANK L. BENNETT.

—, Fla., May 8, 1900. I inclose money-order for 75 cents, for your good paper. Wish I was able to order 100 copies, and have them distributed in various States, but money is lacking. We are always glad to see the REVIEW come; and, after reading and re-reading the papers, they are passed on to others. They never grow old. Hope to be able to send more subscriptions soon. I find quite a number who like the REVIEW. R. H. GARNER.

—, Cal., April 29, 1900. Inclosed please find $1.50, for renewal of my subscription to the REVIEW. We feel lost when we do not have it, and can not afford to miss a copy. MRS. J. J. BOLTON.

—, N. D., May 1, 1900. Please find inclosed $1.50, to renew my subscription to the REVIEW, and also another $1.50 for the same to be sent to —. We can not think of trying to get along without the REVIEW, but esteem it more than our necessary food. J. W. SHIELDS.

—, Tex., April 25, 1900. Inclosed you will find 50 cents, for which please extend my subscription to your good paper the REVIEW. I can not think of doing without its weekly visits. For more than twelve years, it has been my only preacher. ISABELLA REED.

—, Ohio, May 25, 1900. In February I took a four-months' trial subscription to the REVIEW; and now I could not do without the paper. I take both the REVIEW and the Signs of the Times, and care more for them than for any other papers I ever read. I received the love of the truth in February, and these two papers have helped me wonderfully. MRS. ETTA CONVERSE.

—, Ind., May 28, 1900. The REVIEW has been coming to our home, either to my mother's address or mine, for fourteen years. We are isolated Sabbath-keepers, and the REVIEW is a necessity, a “must have,” in our home. I do not see how any Adventist family can possibly do without it. Inclosed please find $1, to extend the time. LIZZIE CRUM.

—, Iowa, May 29, 1900. I wish to thank you all for the dear old REVIEW. It is the only preacher I have. Have taken it for seven years, and could not get along without it. MRS. M. E. BULDERBOCK.

—, Pa., May —, 1900. Please let me know if I can get some REVIEWs of 1900. How I wish I could put a copy of this good paper in the home of every person in the land! Please let me know what it would cost, per copy, to have them mailed from your office. Also, what would it cost me to have some sent to me for distribution? May God stir up his people to scatter our literature. WM. T. MARKEL.

—, Ga., May 29, 1900. We did not receive last week's REVIEW, No. 21. Please send us one, as we can't afford to miss one copy of the dear REVIEW. From its pages we get much good. God bless every one connected with the work. Can I get five or ten copies of No. — for sending off and for distribution? MRS. M. J. MACMILLAN.

—, Minn., May 27, 1900. My subscription to the REVIEW expired May 15. Many thanks for sending the next number. I do not know how to do without it. Many times its weekly visits have been a source of encouragement and comfort. Inclosed find $1.50 for another year's subscription. I have been keeping the Bible Sabbath for sixteen years, and have missed but few of the weekly visits of the REVIEW. T. R. BUTLER.

—, Ind., May 28, 1900. Am sorry that I can not send my subscription for one year; still, I am glad that you are so liberal as to take subscriptions for a shorter period; for I do not want to do without our good friend the REVIEW. E. HAYES.

—, Cal., May 15, 1900. I am delighted with the REVIEW. Have taken it for forty years. MARY M. P. COOK.