A CERTAIN famous prehistoric skull was unearthed at Gibraltar a few years ago. Many scientists have produced various theories regarding the skull, and according to the Christian Advocate Prof. Arthur Keith of London has lately announced his conclusions, and here they are: 1. “I have little doubt that the skull is that of a woman. 2. “Discarding technicalities, from the size of her brain she must have been a shrewd one—probably a woman, too, of considerable spirit. 3. “One can reckon pretty accurately also the time at which she lived. 4. “It must have been at least 600,000 years ago. 5. “From the shape of the jaws and the fact that the muscles of mastication were remarkably strong it is possible to deduce what this prehistoric woman ate. Nuts and roots probably entered very largely into her diet. . . . 6. “The men of 600,000 years ago were without doubt long-armed. Their legs were short, and they had abnormally thick necks. It is clear, too, I think, that their brains were far larger than has previously been conceded to be the case. It seems reasonably certain, too, that they were able to speak to each other, for from my examination of the brain cavity of the skull I have been able to deduce quite clearly that the cells controlling speech were there.” “The prehistoric woman’s skull indicates she had a large nose. Her eyes, too, must have been prominent, and her palate was one third larger than that of the woman of to-day.” The Christian Advocate well remarks, “Many people charge Christians with mental weakness or superstition because they believe in things that they can not see and in things that are not now able to be paralleled; but it must be a very confiding and superstitious class, scientific or unscientific, who will believe that all this stuffing and stretching can be demonstrated from a single skull.”