—James Orr, D.D., professor of apologetics and theology at Theological College of the U. F. Church, Glasgow, has an article in the November Homiletic Review, entitled “Criticism in Troubled Waters,” in which he goes on to show that Prof. B. D. Eerdmans, a student of Kuenen, a critic of critics, and himself as revolutionary as was his master, who has long been an advocate of the theory of the composite authorship of Genesis, “now writes elaborately to announce that he breaks with this theory utterly;” that he definitely separates himself from the Graf-Kuenen-Wellhausen school, “and I contest the so-called newer documentary hypothesis generally.” And Professor Orr says that those who read his criticisms, while not endorsing the theories he proposes as a substitute, will agree that in the main he succeeds in his object, and clearly shows that the theory that Genesis is a patchwork of a half dozen different authors is untenable. But will the critics admit it?