HOW OTHERS VIEW THE SIGNS OF THE TIMES

8%

Pacific Press Publishing Company · Oakland, California · Feb 5, 1902

FromSigns of the Times, Vol. 28, No. 6.

Read the full edition

HOW OTHERS VIEW THE SIGNS OF THE TIMES.

Mrs. D. G. Campbell of Red Hill, Va., in renewing her paper writes: “I do not wish to miss any numbers, as I do not see how I could do without the paper. I prize it next to my Bible. I have been a reader of the SIGNS for four years, and hope I shall be as long as I live.”
“I must say that the SIGNS week by week becomes better and better, and is a source of strength and comfort. It is also a wonderful help in the work for others, being so full of truths for the present time. As I look through the Outlook Department from week to week, I turn my mind to the scripture which reads, ‘The night is far spent, the day is at hand,’ and am led to exclaim, Of a truth this is so. May God bless the efforts of the SIGNS in presenting this truth before the world, is my earnest hope and constant prayer.”—Sterrie A. Wellman.
Mrs. Rosa Anders, Hagerstown, Md., writes: “I can sincerely express myself as being highly pleased with the SIGNS. The paper is all we could desire, and I think it is growing more and more interesting and instructive.”
“I have taken the SIGNS for eight years, and must say it is getting better all the time. I consider it one of the best papers published. May God bless this silent messenger of truth.”—Mrs. Maud Maddox, Garden Grove, Cal.
Mrs. C. E. Chappell, Newport News, Va., in renewing her subscription says: “I must say for your paper that it is the very best of any kind I ever read, and I do not believe it has an equal in the world. I have read every copy of it since I first met with it more than two years ago. May it ever prosper, and continue to give the truth as it is in the Word, to the world.”
Mrs. J. L. Wray, Kansas City, Mo., says: “I find that the time for which I subscribed for this splendid paper has expired. I feel that I just can’t do without it, altho I had to stop all my other papers, magazines, etc. Be sure that my renewal dates back to the Oct. 2nd number, as I can not bear to miss a single copy.”
Tacoma, Wash., Jan. 23, 1902.
It seems to me the SIGNS gets better, if such a thing is possible, each week. Wishing you God’s blessing for 1902 and all time, I am sincerely yours, Sumner T. Merrill.
Columbus, Ohio, Jan. 20, 1902.
Editor of the SIGNS: Some friend of mine has had the SIGNS sent to me for some time, and I am very much pleased with the precious truths they bring to me every week. But somehow my paper has failed to come. My last paper was dated Jan. 1, 1902, and I am very sorry to lose any of the copies, for there are articles in each paper I do not want to miss. One article I desire to have very much is this “Letter That Fell from Heaven.” Will you be kind enough to send me the back numbers, and oblige your sister in Christ.
A man of experience in New York writes: “I think there is no paper like the SIGNS. It is beautifully illustrated, attractive in every way, instructive, edifying, and full of valuable reading matter that ought to suit the taste of all. It has been a great help to me, and I recommend it to every one.”
From a gentleman who has just received a sample copy of the SIGNS, we received the following: “I value the paper highly, and shall be glad to work for it.”