REVIEW TESTIMONY MEETING.—NO. 6.
——, MANITOBA, Feb. 13, 1900. I have not been getting my paper regularly. These papers are too valuable to lose. Not only do I study and enjoy the articles myself, but I mail them to my mother in England, who re-mails them to my sister-in-law. E. O. TINLING. ——, CAL., Feb. 13, 1900. Inclosed please find 50 cents for four months’ subscription for the REVIEW, as I wish all the “Studies in Galatians.” Begin where you left off before, so I shall get every number. These are excellent articles, and I believe they are destined to do a good work. I hope to see them, or something as good, in tract form soon. ARTHUR C. BEAUCHAMP. ——, WASH., Feb. 14, 1900. Inclosed find $1.50, for which send the REVIEW one year. I could not do without the paper. MRS. MARY ROUNDS. ——, VT., Feb. 16, 1900. I send you 50 cents, for which please send the REVIEW to the Baptist minister at —, also to —, for two months to each. My heart is with you in the work. O. HALE. ——, IND., Feb. 19, 1900. Inclosed is 75 cents, to continue my subscription, which expires the 27th inst. The REVIEW is so interesting that I can not do without it. S. J. LECKLIDER. ——, OHIO, Feb. 17, 1900. You will find inclosed 60 cents, for which please send me the REVIEW for four months, as offered on first page of sample copy. You will oblige me by beginning my subscription with the February 20 number, as I have had that for February 13. I had never seen a REVIEW until I sent for a sample copy last week; but the truths in it are so plain, and apply to this time so well, that I feel I must have more of the papers. MRS. ETTA CONVERSE. ——, MASS., Feb. 12, 1900. Would say that my family and I greatly enjoy the REVIEW. It does seem as if it grew better each week. We hope it will never miss coming to our home until the end. We send away every copy after we read it. May God bless your good work in the future as in the past. A. H. HILL. ——, ILL., Jan. 4, 1900. You will find inclosed $1.50 for renewal of my paper. I could not send you new subscriptions, because I am not able to go out in the cold very much. My prayers are that a blessing will be poured out on you, and that this silent messenger will go from home to home where it has not yet been. It is a great comfort to me, as I can not get to church. HARRIET OBERHOLTZER. ——, MICH., Jan. 9, 1900. Inclosed you will find post-office order for $1.50 for the REVIEW. I can not do without it. ELIJAH T. FLETCHER. ——, KY., Dec. 31, 1899. The REVIEW is much enjoyed, and we appreciate your efforts during the last six months. My parents, though not of the truth, seem to be more interested than usual in the REVIEW. A friend who has been reading it for some time, can not do without it. She no longer takes her church paper; for the REVIEW fills the place it can not. Inclosed please find 75 cents, in money order. MISS JOE HUNT. ——, LA., Feb. 7, 1900. Inclosed find post-office money order for 75 cents. I had been waiting in order to send a year’s subscription; but I can not get along without the REVIEW another week. It seems as if one of the family were gone. O. A. SAXBY. ——, ORE., Feb. 18, 1900. The REVIEW has again found its way to our home, for which we are indeed thankful; for we feel lost without it. C. H. LUNNING. ——, WIS., Feb. 13, 1900. As my subscription expired February 6, I send my renewal to-day. The REVIEW is invaluable to us; we could not do without it. With the inclosed blank you will find post-office order for $1.50. MAMIE L. BROWN. ——, IOWA, Feb. 12, 1900. Will you send me about three copies of the REVIEW this week, and three next week, for sample copies? I sent one order to our society to-day. The REVIEW was pronounced by a Methodist woman the best religious paper she had ever read. I will be here two weeks yet, and will try to secure a few more names. B. L. DIEFFENBACHER. ——, MICH., Feb. 6, 1900. My REVIEW has not come yet. I have been to the post-office several times for it, but the postmaster said that it did not come last week. The last copy I received was dated January 23. Please send the others to me; for I am lost without my paper. I wish to keep pace with the message. God bless the REVIEW, and all that are engaged in the glorious work of the Third Angel’s Message. WM. FROST. ——, ME., Feb. 8, 1900. I do love the dear REVIEW, which a friend has kindly sent us for a long time. How it cheered our lonely hearts in our shut-in life, words can not express. A dear friend used to bring it to me each Friday, so I could have it Sabbath, to read to mother. We have prayed for its editors many times. MRS. NELLIE M. HASKELL. ——, IOWA, Jan. 28, 1900. I inclose a notice of father’s death. He had taken the REVIEW for fifteen years, the only copy he failed to read in that time being the one that came the day before he died. Please change the address. U. MATOTT. ——, KAN., Feb. 9, 1900. Inclosed find a 50-cent money order, for which please send the REVIEW to —, Kan., for four months. Words can not express my love for the truths that are in the REVIEW. MINNIE S. BIEDERMAN. ——, CAL., Jan. 10, 1900. For a quarter of a century the REVIEW has been a constant and welcome visitor to my home; and we would as soon think of getting along without our daily food as to do without the REVIEW. It gets better all the time. M. C. ISRAEL. ——, FLA., Dec. 11, 1899. I am making a personal effort to get every Sabbath-keeper in the State to take the REVIEW. Next to the Bible and the Testimonies I regard it the best help to growth in grace. Before I took my stand with this people, I became a subscriber to the REVIEW, and I think I know something of it as a source of life. KENNETH KOCK. ——, VT., Jan. 2, 1900. My subscription runs out in February; and as I have been a reader of the REVIEW for forty-seven years, I should sooner think of going without my daily bread than without that paper. I have one copy, which I read, and then send to my daughter. I need more to lend or give to my neighbors, so this year I want two copies, for which find inclosed $3. M. M. RAYMOND. ——, IOWA, Jan. 9, 1900. My subscription does not expire until February 20, but, as I have the money now, will renew, as last year I had to do without the paper several weeks. No one knows how much I missed it. I could not get the money; but now, if I really have to do without other things, I must have the paper. I have been a constant reader of the REVIEW since 1868, and last year was the first time that I failed to get the money to renew on time. The paper grows better and better as we near the end. God bless the dear old REVIEW, and may it continue to shed light and comfort on many souls. MRS. R. M. ROBERTS.