ONE ERROR LEADS TO ANOTHER

17%

International Tract and Missionary Society · Oakland, California · Jan 6, 1887

FromSigns of the Times, Vol. 13, No. 1.

Read the full edition

ONE ERROR LEADS TO ANOTHER.

IN a discourse upon baptism, a Methodist minister said:—
"Taken in connection with the Scripture facts we have adduced, it would stand thus: 'Infants of believing parents were constituted members of the visible church 3,757 years ago, by a positive direction of Jehovah; but there is no express command in the New Testament touching their membership;' the Baptists say, 'Therefore they are excluded from the New Testament rite of admission.' But we say, Therefore they should be baptized. What would become of the Christian Sabbath under such meddling hands as the Baptists apply to infants? The New Testament nowhere expressly enjoins the observance of it, therefore it must not be observed. Will they abide the result? Candor would oblige us to say, that, as the law made under the old dispensation for the observance of the Sabbath has never been repealed, that law is still binding. Though it has been changed by apostolic use, from the seventh day to the first day, neither the Baptists nor ourselves believe that this change, together with the silence of the New Testament touching its observance, releases us from the obligation to keep it holy. And if the Baptists would use the same logic and the same honesty in reference to infants, they would say that neither the change of the ritual from circumcision to baptism, nor the silence of the New Testament respecting its application to infants, releases us from the obligation to administer it to them."
This argument is an attempt to engraft one error upon another, or to prove that because the Baptists observe one tradition concerning which the New Testament is silent, they ought to receive another of the same character. Carry out this principle, and all the traditions and teachings of the Roman Catholic Church would be fastened upon us, and how much more, is uncertain; for there are a great many practices about which the New Testament and the Old, too, are silent.
It is hard to see how the Baptists can answer this argument while they hold to the change of the Sabbath. And men are more inclined to add one human tradition to another, than to abandon those they have, for the truth.
R. F. COTTRELL.