WHEN WAS THE SABBATH CHANGED?
[Here is a very good answer to the question from a secular paper, the New York Tribune of Wednesday, Feb. 23, 1898.] J. M. (Red Creek, N. Y.): 1. When did they change the Sabbath from the seventh day of the week to the first day? 2. Why did they do so? 1. The first observance of Sunday that history records was in the fourth century, when Constantine issued an edict (not requiring its observance, but simply abstinence from work) reading, "Let all the judges and people of the town rest, and all the various trades be suspended on the venerable day of the sun." At the time of the issue of this edict, Constantine was a sun-worshiper; he refused to unite with the church until on his death-bed (337).15At the church council in 536 the religious observance of Sunday was recommended, but very little attention was paid to it. In 780, Alcuin, an English prelate, became the spiritual adviser of Charlemagne, when for the first time it was formally declared that the fourth commandment covered the first day of the week; but this declaration was observed by comparatively few, and for eight centuries thereafter Sunday was observed far more for a day of sport and festivity than as a religious one. The English Parliament sat on Sundays, and English courts were held on that day, down to the reign of Elizabeth. In 1593 Dr. Nicholas Bound, of Suffolk County, England, published a work called "The True Doctrine of the Sabbath," in which he maintained, not that Sunday was divinely appointed as a Sabbath, but that the obligation to observe a Sabbath was divine. It was as late as at the opening of the seventeenth century when the Puritans in England began the practice of calling Sunday the Sabbath. 2. There never were, and are not now, any satisfactory reasons given for the calling and observing of Sunday as the Sabbath day. Says Bishop Potter: "Their [the Puritans'] warrant for what they did [with reference to the observance of Sunday as the Sabbath], whether we look for it in the pages of the New Testament or in the traditions of Catholic Christendom, was neither substantial nor sufficient."