Library

American Sentinel

Vol. 8, No. 7

Read this edition
Articles
27
Pages
8
Illustrations
0

In this edition

  1. If Congress can do this in one case, can interpret the Bible in one point, it can do it in any case; it can interpret the Bible on every point. When Congress went beyond the Constitution in this, as it did, it put itself and the Government in line with all the Church and State governments that have ever been, and assumed to itself to be the interpreter of the Bible for all the people in the land, and for all who come into the land. More than that, it not only assumed to itself the right and the authority to interpret and enforce divine law as such, but in doing that it put the stamp of its legislative approval upon a given religious and doctrinal belief. It made an adherence to that belief and observance distinctively necessary to citizenship under this Government. It built a surer foundation for that line of judicial precedent in religious law for which there has never heretofore been any adequate basis.1 paragraphs
  2. The possibilities, rather even the probabilities, of the continuance of the Sunday-closing contest as regards the World's Fair,—and of appeal to the highest court of Sunday-law cases on their merits,—are fraught with much that is uncomfortable to the occupants of the Supreme Bench. Congress took the fatal step in haste last session. In shame at the position in which it finds itself and in fear of the Church party it refuses now to retrace its steps, or even consider the propriety of so doing. When the Supreme Court is put in a similar position what will be its attitude? Will it refuse to review or antagonize the Brewer decision and allow this revolution to take its course?1 paragraphs
  3. The Tennessee Prosecutions for Sunday Labor.C. P. B.16 paragraphs
  4. Now that Congress has gone beyond the Constitution on one point, for religion’s sake, and has legislated to close the World’s Fair on Sunday, it may, for the same reason, go beyond it on any or every point.1 paragraphs
  5. THE Congress of the United States had no right to put the Bible into its legislation and make it the basis of any legislative measure. The Constitution is the proper basis of congressional legislation, not the Bible. But the Constitution has been ignored and legislation had upon an assumed Biblical basis. To reach this the Constitution has been violated, the word of God has been blasphemed, and a statutory misinterpretation of a divine commandment has been had.1 paragraphs
  6. THE commandment says the seventh day is the Sabbath of the Lord; but in the face of this plain declaration the Senate of the United States has put its own interpretation upon that commandment, and has declared that the statement “the seventh day is the Sabbath” means “the first day of the week, commonly called Sunday.” Thus the Congress of the United States has taken the fourth commandment from the Bible and put it into its legislation, and has put its own interpretation upon the divine statute.1 paragraphs
  7. This is not strictly an adequate basis, but it will no doubt be accepted as such, in connection with the Supreme Court decision that this is a “Christian Nation.” It may be that the Supreme Court will be called upon during the coming year to state its position upon this definitely, and not in general terms. This may be brought about through the question of State rights, as to whether Congress has any jurisdiction within the municipality of Chicago by which it may enforce the Sunday-closing proviso, or lay any penalty for its non-observance. It may come through an appeal from the lower courts of some case brought under a religious statute or judicial precedent. However it may come it is not probable that the Supreme Court can long avoid the responsibility of defining directly the position which it has taken in the case of the Church of the Holy Trinity of New York. When that point is reached the Supreme Court will face an awkward alternative. It will be necessary either to antagonize openly the First Amendment to the Constitution, and indirectly the Tenth Amendment by assuming for Congress powers which have not been granted to it; or the opinion of Justice Brewer that this is a “Christian Nation,” and in which the entire bench concurred, will have to be overruled.1 paragraphs
  8. To Try the Case upon Its Merits.7 paragraphs
  9. A Word to the General Assembly of Tennessee.Editor7 paragraphs
  10. It has been recommended that March 5 be set apart by all denominations as a day for considering in the Sunday-schools and pulpits, the question of Sunday closing.8 paragraphs
  11. Extract from Address of A. T. Jones Before the House Committee on World’s Fair for Repeal of Sunday Legislation.A. T. Jones10 paragraphs
  12. Extract from the Speech of Mayor Washburne Before the House Committee.9 paragraphs
  13. A Candid Statement from the “Political Dissenter.”Editor9 paragraphs
  14. The Rights of Christians.7 paragraphs
  15. Are We “a Christian Nation?”8 paragraphs
  16. Does It Teach Apostolic Doctrines?A. Mallett21 paragraphs
  17. Commingling of Church and State.4 paragraphs
  18. Individual Immortality Dependent upon Sunday-Closing.W. A. Colcord6 paragraphs
  19. A Peculiar Juxtaposition.12 paragraphs
  20. Let Us Do More.Editor4 paragraphs
  21. Responsible to God.2 paragraphs
  22. PROSECUTIONS for working on Sunday are gradually becoming the recognized order of the day,—the arraignment of six men for violation of the Sunday law, on February 5, in this city, is recorded as follows:—5 paragraphs
  23. In its issue of January 29, the New York Sun said in reference to the Sunday opening of the World's Fair:—9 paragraphs
  24. THE excitement on the question of Sunday closing of theaters in Denver seems to have been felt as far as Oakland, Cal., for:5 paragraphs
  25. THE latest word from the “Adventist cases” at Paris, Tenn., is this: “The remaining case for possible trial at this term of court was continued yesterday on affidavit by the Attorney-General that the State could not safely go to trial because of the absence of important witnesses. It is almost certain that no conviction can ever be had in the case. The charge of the Judge in the Dortch case was such as to make it almost impossible to convict any one of Sunday work unless the work were done in an exceedingly open and public manner.”1 paragraphs
  26. The present status of the persecution of Seventh-day Adventists in Tennessee is worthy of careful notice. These cases have attracted the attention of candid, clear-minded, and able, lawyers and legislators. These men, having a correct view of the purpose and intent of law and legislation, realize the error, the inequity, the inconsistency of existing law under which such persecutions can be had. To have called to the defense of truth, those who love truth, and right, and justice, for their own sake is much. But the greater thing yet remains for all,—to still stand for its defense in the coming day of its seeming defeat and ignominy.1 paragraphs
  27. COMMENTING on the growing tendency toward the strict enforcement of Sunday laws in this city the New York Sun says:5 paragraphs