Review and Herald, Vol. 82, No. 28.
The Garden of GethsemaneReview and Herald
Review and Herald Publishing Association · Washington, D. C. · Jul 13, 1905
The Garden of Gethsemane

THE GENERAL OPINION OF
THE LOVER'S LOVE
or JOHN THREE SIXTEEN

Editorial
Gardening
Leaving the Body
Dishonesty in Official Life
Preachers of the Message
Four Greatest Things
The Man of Lawlessness
The Socialist Deluge
Walking According to Tradition
A Modern Sodom
“Altruism” and “Egoism”
Christian ethics—by which I mean the modern ethics of Christian peoples—ignores national boundaries, and knows no difference of race. Its only recognition of an enemy is an instruction to love him. Its working principle is “the brotherhood of man,” as a necessary corollary to “the fatherhood of God.” . . . It teaches the equality of men and the doing “unto others as ye would they should do unto you,” the extension of equal rights to all people. It refuses to see inferiority of rights in color, race, or feebleness. Its message is, “One Father and one family.”
The imperialistic spirit, on the other hand, makes much of national boundaries and differences of race. Its recognition of an enemy is to prepare for war with him. Its working principle is the division of man into hostile nations; and it always has the hated people of some modern “Samaria” to present to the “elect” of its own household as types of the public enemy. It teaches the essential inequality of men, the duty of recognizing that inequality, the duty of doing unto others precisely what you hope they will not be able to do unto you, the refusal of equal rights to some people. It sees inferiority of rights in color, race, and feebleness—especially in the latter. Its message is, “One Father, and he is on our side.”