Shared conversation

James White on the Divinity and Subordination of Christ

Can Christ be both equal to and subordinate to the Father?

AdventAI

Is this an actual statement from James White: “The Father was greater than the Son in that he was first. The Son was equal with the Father in that he had received all things from the Father.” {J. S. White, Review & Herald, January 4, 1881}?

AdventAI

Yes, this is an accurate representation of the faith and teaching regarding the relationship between the Father and the Son. This position emphasizes that while the Son is truly divine and equal in nature to the Father, He is distinct in His origin as the only begotten of the Most High.

  • Priority of the Father: The term "God" is applied to the Son in a subordinate sense, as the Father is the one who anointed Him and is the head over all. It is a self-evident truth that the Word as God was not the same God He was with in the beginning John 1:1-2.

  • Equality Through Inheritance: The Son is equal with the Father because He bears the name and title of His Father and has been clothed with all power, even to the making of the worlds Hebrews 1:1-4. He is the express image of the Father’s person and the brightness of His glory, possessing all the fullness of the Godhead by the Father's appointment Colossians 1:19.

  • The Divinity of the Son: It is not necessary to call other testimony to prove the pre-existent divinity of the Word, as He was with the Father from the beginning 1 John 1:1-2. This exalted one was the identical person who was made flesh and died on the cross, which constitutes the immense sacrifice and wondrous love of God Philippians 2:5-8.

  • The Father as the Source: Jesus Christ is the Son of God, begotten, upheld, and glorified by the Father rather than being the self-existent or independent God in the same sense as the Father. The Father is the one who sends the Son, commands Him what to speak, and gives Him the throne of David John 17:3.

... Word was God, and also the word was with God. Now it needs no proof-indeed it is self-evident-that the Word as God, was not the God he was with. And as there is but “one God” the term must be used in reference to the Word in a subordinate sense, which is explained by Paul’s calling the same pre-existent person, the Son of God. This is a...

With such inspired declarations before us, ought we to say that Jesus Christ is the Self-existent, Independent, Omniscient and Only True God; or the SON of GOD, begotten, upheld, exalted and glorified BY THE FATHER

...; also calling the Word, “his son Jesus Christ.” Verse 3. Now it is reasonable that the Son should bear the name and title of his Father, especially when the Father makes him his exclusive representative to man, and clothes him with such power-“by whom he made the worlds.” That the term God is used in such sense is also proved by...

...refore he was not an independent lawgiver. Says the eternal Father when speaking of his Son, “He shall speak unto them all that I shall command him.” Jesus testifies of himself on this subject, and his testimony agrees with that of his Fathe...

Sources · 8
  1. ARSH October 27, 1863, page 173.9Advent Review, and Sabbath Herald, vol. 22James Springer White
  2. SOAP 81.3A Solemn AppealJames Springer White
  3. ARSH June 12, 1860, page 27.47Advent Review, and Sabbath Herald, vol. 16James Springer White
  4. ARSH November 6, 1860, page 193.16Advent Review, and Sabbath Herald, vol. 16James Springer White
  5. ARSH June 18, 1861, page 28.18Advent Review, and Sabbath Herald, vol. 18James Springer White
  6. ARSH October 27, 1863, page 174.5Advent Review, and Sabbath Herald, vol. 22James Springer White
  7. SDSL 34.2The Seventh Day of the Week is the Sabbath of the LordJames Springer White
  8. ARSH January 26, 1860, page 75.5Advent Review, and Sabbath Herald, vol. 15James Springer White