Shared conversation

Does Jesus Contradict the Eye for an Eye Law?

Did Jesus really contradict the Old Testament 'eye for an eye' law?

AdventAI

Why does it appears that Jesus is contradicting the Old Testament teaching of an eye for an eye in Matthew 5:38-42?

AdventAI

Matthew 5:38-42

38 You have heard that it has been said, An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth:

39 But I say to you, That you resist not evil: but whoever shall smite you on your right cheek, turn to him the other also.

40 And if any man will sue you at the law, and take away your coat, let him have your cloak also.

41 And whoever shall compel you to go a mile, go with him two.

42 Give to him that asks you, and from him that would borrow of you turn not you away.

AdventAI

Jesus does not contradict the Old Testament in Matthew 5:38-42 but instead magnifies the law by elevating it from a civil statute of justice to a higher standard of spiritual holiness and personal non-resistance. He clarifies that the Gospel is a revision and spiritualization of the moral principles given to the Jews, designed to give them greater stringency rather than to abolish them Matthew 5:17-18.

The Distinction Between Civil Law and Personal Conduct

  • The "eye for an eye" principle was a civil law intended for judges to administer justice and limit private vendettas Exodus 21:24.

  • The Jews had incorrectly applied this legal standard to their personal relationships, using it to justify a spirit of retaliation and revenge.

  • Jesus corrected this misconception by teaching that while the civil law exists for the state, the follower of Christ must live by the law of grace and love Matthew 5:38-39.

  • Under the Gospel, the "stoning system" and the strict administration of literal retaliation are replaced by a system where evil is met with patience and kindness John 8:1-11.

Fulfilling and Magnifying the Law

  • Christ’s teachings do not destroy the law of the prophets but fulfill them by showing that they embrace the internal thoughts and intents of the heart.

  • While the law says "Do and live," grace says "Believe and live," yet both proceed from the same divine Author whose principles of government never change Luke 10:28.

  • Jesus showed that the law is a representation of God's character and requires perfect spiritual obedience, not just outward compliance Matthew 5:48.

  • By teaching non-resistance, Jesus was reiterating the foundational principle of loving one’s neighbor as oneself, which was already present in the Old Testament Leviticus 19:18.

The Rule of Non-Resistance

  • Non-resistance is the rule of the Christian life, meaning a believer must be willing to suffer wrong patiently rather than resist evil through force 1 Peter 2:20-21.

  • Retaliation and defiance are contrary to Christ's methods and only serve to destroy the peace of the soul and grieve the Holy Spirit.

  • The instruction to turn the other cheek or give up one's cloak illustrates that the divine law requires more than what any civil law can exact Matthew 5:39-40.

  • True followers of Jesus are to be peacemakers, reflecting the character of their Father who is kind even to the unthankful and the evil Matthew 5:44-45.

Overcoming the Spirit of Revenge

  • The natural human heart is filled with pride, envy, and a desire for revenge, but Christ provides strength to rise above these slights and annoyances.

  • Revenge has never conquered a foe; instead, it is the "soft answer" and a well-regulated temper that exert a good influence.

  • Jesus himself provided the ultimate example of this teaching, as contumely and persecution never caused Him to retaliate upon His enemies 1 Peter 2:21-23.

  • By refusing to seek revenge and instead praying for persecutors, the Christian manifests the "salt" and "light" that preserves the world from corruption Matthew 5:13-16.

Sources · 28
  1. 2SP 223.1The Spirit of Prophecy, vol. 2Ellen Gould White
  2. ARSH March 10, 1859, page 121.13Advent Review, and Sabbath Herald, vol. 13Uriah Smith
  3. SpTA09 58.2Special Testimonies for Ministers and Workers—No. 9Ellen Gould White
  4. SBBS 283.3Source Book for Bible StudentsGeneral Conference of SDA
  5. SC3 140.13[Sabbath Controversy #3] A Vindication of the Seventh-day Sabbath, and the Commandments of GodJoseph Bates
  6. HBS 222.2Handbook for Bible StudentsGeneral Conference of SDA
  7. CDFW 4.5The “Christian” Demand for WarEllet Joseph Waggoner
  8. DA 310.3The Desire of AgesEllen Gould White
  9. 2SP 223.2The Spirit of Prophecy, vol. 2Ellen Gould White
  10. AMS July 23, 1896, page 227.3The American Sentinel 11Alonzo Trevier Jones
  11. TDOC 93.2The Doctrine of ChristWilliam Warren Prescott
  12. ST October 24, 1895, par. 6The Signs of the TimesEllen Gould White
  13. PP 373.2Patriarchs and ProphetsEllen Gould White
  14. ST February 24, 1898, par. 5The Signs of the TimesEllen Gould White
  15. ECE 647.3Ecclesiastical EmpireAlonzo Trevier Jones
  16. HST August 15, 1840, page 76.1Signs of the Times [Himes], vol. 1Signs of the Times [J.V. Himes]
  17. ChL 64.1Christian LeadershipEllen Gould White
  18. CW 64.2Counsels to Writers and EditorsEllen Gould White
  19. 2MCP 520.4Mind, Character, and Personality, vol. 2Ellen Gould White
  20. PTUK October 8, 1896, page 642.6The Present Truth, vol. 12Ellet Joseph Waggoner
  21. ARSH August 5, 1852, page 52.44The Advent Review, and Sabbath Herald, vol. 3The Advent Review and Sabbath Herald
  22. 2SP 206.1The Spirit of Prophecy, vol. 2Ellen Gould White
  23. 3BC 1159.7EGW SDA Bible Commentary, vol. 3Ellen Gould White
  24. ST August 17, 1888, par. 7The Signs of the TimesEllen Gould White
  25. VSS 144.2The Voice in Speech and SongEllen Gould White
  26. RH November 6, 1883, par. 18The Review and HeraldEllen Gould White
  27. DA 306.3The Desire of AgesEllen Gould White
  28. 2SP 211.2The Spirit of Prophecy, vol. 2Ellen Gould White