Shared conversation
The Peril of Spiritual Delay: Rejecting Christ's Imminent Return
What spiritual attitude characterizes the "evil servant"?
JESUS not able to return because Adventists rejected the 1888 message
AdventAI
That is an extremely important question that addresses crucial spiritual attitudes and historical events within the movement looking for Christ's return 🧭. While the ultimate reason for the continued duration of time is God’s infinite mercy allowing a larger span for global repentance, adopting the attitude that "My Lord delayeth His coming" is identified as a fatal characteristic of the evil servant.
The crucial message of Christ’s righteousness, known as the Third Angel’s Message, was presented in clear, distinct lines because the church had previously been looking to man rather than focusing on Jesus, in whom all hope of eternal life is centered. Resistance to accepting this message of present truth demonstrated a dangerous attitude of spiritual neglect and worldliness, which mirrors the evil servant’s disbelief.
The Danger of Saying, “My Lord Delayeth His Coming”
The sentiment that the Lord is delaying His return is explicitly warned against in Scripture and is associated with profound spiritual peril Matthew 24:48.
The Mark of the Evil Servant: The individual who says in their heart, "My Lord delayeth His coming," is identified as the evil servant who has been entrusted with solemn responsibilities but is imperiling the Lord's goods.
Worldliness and Violence: This attitude manifests in actions: the evil servant begins to smite their fellow servants and eats and drinks with the drunken Matthew 24:49. This smiting happens when brethren, influenced by worldliness and self-exaltation, hate those who stand firm for the truth, similar to how Cain slew Abel because he would not be reconciled to God.
A Soothing, Malarious Influence: It is a serious matter to be noncommittal about the light of present truth, as the resulting attitude suggests delay. The spirit and influence of this "peace and safety" sentiment is malarious, designed to soothe those who ought to be stirred by the truth and standing faithfully at their post of duty.
Impeding the Warning: When leaders adopt this attitude, they are removing from the minds of others the conviction that the Lord is coming quickly, leading people to a presumptuous, careless delay, confirming them in worldliness and stupor.
Resistance to the Message of Righteousness by Faith
The conflicts over the message of righteousness by faith, championed by Brethren Jones and Waggoner at Minneapolis, demonstrated the presence of the attitude that impedes necessary preparation.
Internal Opposition: The righteousness by faith message was a testimony given to God’s servants, but some highly placed brethren, including editors of influential publications, were far from being in harmony with the truths taught.
Spiritual Pride: The appreciation of God's promises in all their breadth and fullness is necessary to save believers from self-confidence, criticism, unbelief, and pharisaism. When self-esteem and customs are disturbed by the message of truth, misunderstanding and misapplication can alienate the hearts of those who should be brethren.
The Consequences of Unbelief: Those who enshroud themselves in unbelief often call darkness light and light darkness, and they reject the light given to them, enclosing themselves in impenetrable darkness. Those who reject the light of the three angels' messages are refusing to accept testimonies they ought to believe, instead accepting gossip and human testimonies.
The Lord requires us to put away any scriptural exposition or attitude which means, "My Lord delayeth His coming," because the Son of Man comes in a day and hour we do not expect Matthew 24:44. It is essential for believers to constantly watch and avoid the worldliness and spiritual pride that lead to this dangerous declaration, lest they be found unready when the Lord appears Matthew 24:42.
Sources · 15
- 10MR 265.2Manuscript Releases, vol. 10 [Nos. 771-850]
- 15LtMs, Ms 82, 1900, par. 36Letters and Manuscripts — Volume 15 (1900)
- ARSH January 9, 1900, page 24.11The Advent Review and Sabbath Herald, vol. 77
- 11MR 284.4Manuscript Releases, vol. 11 [Nos. 851-920]
- TM 237.2Testimonies to Ministers and Gospel Workers
- 18MR 162.2Manuscript Releases, vol. 18 [Nos. 1301-1359]
- 21MR 347.1Manuscript Releases, vol. 21 [Nos. 1501-1598]
- 14MR 115.2Manuscript Releases, vol. 14 [Nos. 1081-1135]
- PH154 20.1Special Testimony to Battle Creek Church
- RH August 23, 1898, par. 4The Review and Herald
- 10LtMs, Lt 84, 1895, par. 19Letters and Manuscripts — Volume 10 (1895)
- MMM 318.2Manuscripts and Memories of Minneapolis
- 11MR 293.3Manuscript Releases, vol. 11 [Nos. 851-920]
- 11MR 287.3Manuscript Releases, vol. 11 [Nos. 851-920]
- 20LtMs, Ms 62, 1905, par. 19Letters and Manuscripts — Volume 20 (1905)