Shared conversation

Thou Shalt Not Kill: Military Service Exception?

Does "Thou shalt not kill" prohibit all forms of taking life?

AdventAI

Why does the church not obey the thou shalt not kill commandment by disfranchisement of those that partake in military service of any kind

AdventAI

The church does not disobey the "Thou shalt not kill" commandment by disfranchising those who partake in military service because the commandment is often misunderstood when applied to such circumstances. The sixth commandment, "Thou shalt not kill," as found in Exodus 20:13 prohibits murder, not all forms of taking human life.

Here's why this distinction is important:

Understanding the Sixth Commandment 🛡️

The commandment "Thou shalt not kill" is not an absolute prohibition against all forms of taking human life, such as in warfare or capital punishment. Instead, it specifically forbids malicious murder.

  • Divine Intent: The law of God, including the sixth commandment, is spiritual and reaches beyond outward acts to the thoughts and intentions of the heart. While it condemns hatred and malicious thoughts that could lead to murder, it does not condemn all forms of taking life.

  • Biblical Examples: Throughout the Bible, God commanded or permitted the taking of life in specific contexts:

  • Warfare: Abraham, who "obeyed God's voice, and kept his charge, his commandments, his statutes, and his laws" Genesis 26:5, was a warrior who engaged in battle to rescue Lot Genesis 14:13-17. This demonstrates that killing in defensive war, or war commanded by God, is not a violation of His law. Joshua also led the Israelites in war against Ai, and God commanded them to take the spoil Joshua 8:19-21.

  • Capital Punishment: God explicitly commanded capital punishment for certain offenses, such as blasphemy Leviticus 24:14-16 and Sabbath-breaking Numbers 15:32-36. This shows that the civil power, as God's minister, is authorized to execute wrath upon evildoers Romans 13:4-6.

  • Self-Preservation: The principle of self-preservation, which includes safeguarding human life, is implicitly acknowledged.

Disfranchisement and the Church's Stance 🤝

The concept of "disfranchisement" in a civil context means the removal of certain rights or privileges, such as the right to vote or hold public office. When this term is used in relation to the church and military service, it points to a misunderstanding of the church's role and its interpretation of divine law.

  • Church and State: The church's purpose is not to enforce civil laws, but to uphold God's moral law. While civil governments may forbid murder and theft, they do not do so as "commandments of God" but as part of maintaining societal order. The church's focus is on the spiritual application of God's law, which involves the heart and motives, something no earthly power can legislate.

  • Maintaining Moral Purity: The church seeks to guide its members toward holiness and conformity to God's will, which includes keeping all ten commandments, not just the letter, but the spirit of the law Psalm 51:6. This means cultivating a heart free from malice and hatred, which aligns with the true intent of "Thou shalt not kill" 1 John 3:15.

  • No Disfranchisement for Military Service: The church does not "disfranchise" individuals for participating in military service. The principle is that if an individual sincerely believes in the command "Thou shalt not kill," they would not engage in war to take lives unnecessarily. However, this is a personal conviction and not a basis for formal church "disfranchisement." The church's responsibility is to teach and uphold God's law, which is perfect and converts the soul Psalm 19:7.

In essence, the misunderstanding arises from equating all taking of life with "murder" as condemned by the sixth commandment. The divine law, when properly understood, permits certain instances of taking life, particularly in the context of justly defending one's nation or executing divine justice, without violating the commandment against murder.

Sources · 26
  1. ARSH October 14, 1862, page 154.13Advent Review, and Sabbath Herald, vol. 20James Springer White
  2. ARSH October 21, 1862, page 163.30Advent Review, and Sabbath Herald, vol. 20James Springer White
  3. ARSH September 18, 1860, page 138.12Advent Review, and Sabbath Herald, vol. 16James Springer White
  4. SITI December 30, 1889, page 632.93The Signs of the Times, vol. 15Ellet Joseph Waggoner
  5. WOR 43.3Waggoner on RomansEllet Joseph Waggoner
  6. GCB February 8, 1895, page 66.1General Conference Bulletin, vol. 1General Conference of SDA
  7. ARSH May 17, 1864, page 193.21Advent Review, and Sabbath Herald, vol. 23Advent Review, and Sabbath Herald
  8. AMS December 25, 1889, page 377.7American Sentinel, vol. 4Ellet Joseph Waggoner
  9. SITI January 21, 1886, page 40.13The Signs of the Times, vol. 12Ellet Joseph Waggoner
  10. SITI September 18, 1893, page 420.55The Signs of the Times, vol. 19Ellet Joseph Waggoner
  11. ARSH October 14, 1862, page 159.13Advent Review, and Sabbath Herald, vol. 20James Springer White
  12. ARSH August 27, 1857, page 133.15Advent Review, and Sabbath Herald, vol. 10Uriah Smith
  13. ARSH October 18, 1853, page 114.10The Advent Review, and Sabbath Herald, vol. 4The Advent Review and Sabbath Herald
  14. ARSH July 11, 1865, page 41.17Advent Review, and Sabbath Herald, vol. 26Advent Review, and Sabbath Herald
  15. AMS June 18, 1896, page 195.15The American Sentinel 11Alonzo Trevier Jones
  16. AMS September 11, 1890, page 282.2The American Sentinel 5Alonzo Trevier Jones
  17. AMS July 1888, page 55.3American Sentinel, vol. 3Ellet Joseph Waggoner
  18. AMS December 1888, page 94.4American Sentinel, vol. 3Ellet Joseph Waggoner
  19. AMS January 1889, page 3.5American Sentinel, vol. 4Ellet Joseph Waggoner
  20. NSLS27 151.2The National Sunday Law [SL27]Alonzo Trevier Jones
  21. NSLS27 188.1The National Sunday Law [SL27]Alonzo Trevier Jones
  22. NSLRLL 151.2The National Sunday Law [RLL]Alonzo Trevier Jones
  23. GCB December 1895, page 607.2General Conference Bulletin, vol. 1General Conference of SDA
  24. AMS April 7, 1898, page 210.3The American Sentinel 13Alonzo Trevier Jones
  25. 12MR 236.3Manuscript Releases, vol. 12 [Nos. 921-999]Ellen Gould White
  26. SITI March 18, 1886, page 215.1The Signs of the Times, vol. 12Ellet Joseph Waggoner