A Dialogue Between a Predestinarian and His Friend

2%

Pacific Seventh-day Adventist Publishing Association · Oakland, California · Apr 10, 1879

FromSigns of the Times, Vol. 5, No. 15.

Read the full edition

A Dialogue Between a Predestinarian and His Friend

[FROM JOHN WESLEY'S MISCELLANEOUS WORKS.] # A DIALOGUE BETWEEN A PREDESTINARIAN AND HIS FRIEND. "Out of thine own mouth." TO ALL PREDESTINARIANS. 1. I AM informed, some of you have said, that the following quotations are false; that these words were not spoken by these authors; others, that they were not spoken in this sense; and others, that neither you yourself, nor any true predestinarian, ever did, or ever would, speak so. 2. My friends, the authors here quoted are well known, in whom you may read the words with your own eyes. And you who have read them, know in your own conscience, they were spoken in this sense and no other; nay, that this sense of them is professedly defended throughout the whole treatises whence they are taken. 3. But, be this as it may, do you indeed say, "No true predestinarian ever did or ever would speak so?" Why every true predestinarian must speak so, and so must you yourself too, if you dare speak out, unless they and you renounce your fundamental principle. 4. Your fundamental principle is this: "God from eternity ordained whatsoever should come to pass." But from this single position undeniably follows every assertion hereafter mentioned. It remains therefore only that you choose which you please (for one you must choose) of these three things: Either, (1.) To equivocate, evade the question, and prevaricate without end; Or (2.) To swallow all these assertions together, and honestly to avow them; Or (3.) To renounce them all together, and believe in Christ, the Saviour of all.
FRIEND.—Sir, I have heard that you make God the author of all sin, and the destroyer of the greater part of mankind without mercy.
PREDESTINARIAN.—I deny it; I only say, "God did from all eternity unchangeably ordain whatsoever comes to pass." (Assembly's Catechism, Chap. 3.)
F.—Do you make no exception?
P.—No, surely; for "nothing is more absurd than to think anything at all is done but by the ordination of God." (Calvin's Institutes, Book 1, Chap. 16, Sec. 3.)
F.—Do you extend this to the actions of men?
P.—Without doubt: "Every action and motion of every creature is so governed by the hidden counsel of God, that nothing can come to pass but what was ordained by him." (Ib. Sec. 3.)
F.—But what then becomes of the wills of men?
P.—"The wills of men are so governed by the will of God, that they are carried on straight to the mark which he has foreordained." (Ib. Sec. 8.)
F.—I suppose you mean the permissive will of God?
P.—No; I mean, "All things come to pass by the efficacious and irresistible will of God." (Dr. Twisse' Vindiciae Gratiae Potestatis et Providentiae Dei Editio Jensoniana, pars. 3, p. 19.)
F.—Why, then all men must do just what they do?
P.—True: "It is impossible that anything should ever be done, but that which God impels the will of man." (Ib. p. 19.)
F.—But does not this imply the necessity of all events?
P.—"I will not scruple to own that the will of God lays a necessity on all things, and that everything he wills necessarily comes to pass." (Calvin's Inst. b. 3. c. 24, Sec. 8.)
F.—Does sin then necessarily come to pass?
P.—Undoubtedly: "for the almighty power of God extends itself to the first fall, and all other sins of angels and men." (Assembly's Catechism, c. 5.)
F.—I grant, God foresaw the first man would fall.
P.—Nay, "God not only foresaw that Adam would fall, but also ordained that he should." (Calvin's Inst. b. 3, c. 23, Sec. 7.) I know God permitted Adam's fall. P.—I tell you, "he fell not only by the permission, but also by the appointment, of God." (Calvini Responsio ad Calumnias Nebulonis cujusdam ad Articulum primum.) "He sinned because God so ordained, because the Lord saw good." (Calvin's Inst. b. 3, c. 24, Sec. 8.)
F.—But do not those who differ from you, raise many objections against you as to this point?
P.—Yes: "Those poisonous dogs vomit out many things against God." (Ib. b. 3, c. 23, Sec. 2.) "They deny that the Scripture says God decreed Adam's fall. They say he might have chosen either to fall or not, and that God foreordained only to treat him according to his desert: as if God had created the noblest of all his creatures, without foreordaining what should become of him!" (Ib. Sec. 7.)
F.—Did God then make Adam on purpose that he might fall?
P.—Undoubtedly. "God made Adam and Eve to this very purpose, that they might be tempted and led into sin. And by force of his decree, it could not otherwise be but they must sin." (Piscatoris Disput. Praedest. p. 6.)
F.—But do you not ground God's decree on God's foreknowledge rather than his will?
P.—No! "God foresees nothing but what he has decreed, and his decree precedes his knowledge." (Piscat. Disput. Praedist.)
F.—Well, this may truly be termed, a horrible decree.
P.—"I confess it is a horrible decree; yet no one can deny but God foreknew Adam's fall, and therefore foreknew it, because he had ordained it so by his own decree." (Calv. Inst. 1, 3, c. 23, Sec. 7.)
F.—Do you believe, then, that God has by his own positive decree, not only elected some men to life, but also reprobated all the rest?
P.—Most surely, if I believe one, I believe the other. "Many indeed (thinking to excuse God) own election, and yet deny reprobation; but this is quite silly and childish. For without reprobation, election itself cannot stand; whom God passes by, these he reprobates." (Calv. Inst. b. 3, c. 23, Sec. 1.)
F.—Pray explain what you mean by election and reprobation.
P.—With all my heart. "All men are not created for the same end; but some are foreordained to eternal life, others to eternal damnation. So according as every man was created for the one end or the other, we say he was elected or predestinated to life, or reprobated, that is, predestinated to destruction." (Ib. c. 21, Sec. 1.)
F.—Pray, repeat your meaning.
P.—God hath once for all appointed by an eternal and unchangeable decree, to whom he would give salvation, and whom he would devote to destruction." (Ib. Sec. 7.)
F.—Did God make any man on purpose that he might be damned?
P.—Did not I tell you before? "God's first constitution was, that some should be destined to eternal ruin; and to this end their sins were ordained, and denial of grace in order to their sins." (Zanchius de Natura Dei, pp. 553, 554.)
F.—But is not God's predestinating men to life or death grounded on his foreknowledge?
P.—"So the vulgar think; that God, as he foresees every man will deserve, elects them to life, or devotes them to death and damnation." (Calv. Inst. b. 3, c. 22, Sec. 1.)
F.—And do you not think, that reprobation, at least, is grounded on God's foreknowing men's sins?
P.—No indeed: "God of his own good pleasure ordains that many should be born, who are from the womb devoted to inevitable damnation. If any man pretend that God's foreknowledge lays them under no necessity of being damned, but rather that he decreed their damnation, because he foreknew their wickedness, I grant that God's foreknowledge alone lays no necessity on the creature; but eternal life and death depend on the will rather than the foreknowledge of God. If God only foreknew all things that relate to all men, and did not decree and ordain them also, then it might be inquired whether or no his foreknowledge necessitates the thing foreknown. But seeing he therefore foreknows all things that will come to pass, because he has decreed they shall come to pass, it is vain to contend about foreknowledge, since it is plain all things come to pass by God's positive decree." (Ib. c. 23, Sec. 6.)
F.—But if God has positively decreed to damn the greater part of mankind, why does he call upon them to repent and be saved?
P.—"As God has his effectual call, whereby he gives the elect the salvation to which he ordained them, so he has his judgments toward the reprobates, whereby he executes his decree concerning them. As many therefore, as he created to live miserably, and then perish everlastingly; these, that they may be brought to the end for which they were created, he sometimes deprives of the possibility of hearing the word, and at other times, by the preaching thereof, blinds and stupefies them the more." (Ib. c. 24, Sec. 12.)
F.—How is this? I say, if God created them for never-ending death, why does he call to them to turn and live?
P.—"He calls to them, that they may be more deaf; he kindles a light, that they may be more blind; he brings his doctrine to them, that they may be more ignorant; and applies the remedy to them, that may not be healed." (Ib. b. 3, c. 24, Sec. 13.)
F.—Enough, enough. Yet you do not make God the Author of sin!
P.—No certainly: "God cannot be termed the Author of sin, though he is the cause of those actions which are sins." (Petri Martyris Virmi.lii Com. in Roman, p. 413.)
F.—How is he the cause of them then?
P.—Two ways: First, by his eternal, unchangeable decree; Secondly, by his present irresistible power. (To be Continued.)