Judges 18:24
And he said, Ye have taken away my gods which I made, and the priest, and ye are gone away: and what have I more? and what is this that ye say unto me, What aileth thee? And he said, Ye have taken away my gods which I made, and the priest, and ye are gone away: and what have I more? and what is this that ye say unto me, What aileth thee?
Chapters 17 through 21 of Judges record events from the early part of the judges period, earlier in time than chapters 11 through 16, while the main story of the book ends with chapter 16. The verse stands in those closing chapters that record backsliding and its resulting disgrace and punishment, belonging to an account of wrongdoing for which there is no excuse. It belongs to the account of Israel's lawless condition, when people did what was right in their own eyes, and the events in chapters 18 and 19 reveal gross immorality.
The verse records Micah protesting that the Danites had taken away the gods he had made and the priest, a Levite, whom he had hired, leaving him with nothing. His question what have I more expresses his sense of loss of his household idols and priest and of everything he valued and his happiness, feeling that all he had was gone when his god was taken. The Danites persuaded the Levite to leave Micah for the promise of becoming priest to an entire tribe rather than to one man. They carried Micah's idols and priest to Laish, where they established idolatrous worship in the city they renamed Dan, and this worship continued there until the ten tribes went into captivity.
This action was Dan's first apostasy, which is suggested as a reason the tribe of Dan was omitted from the list of tribes sealed in Revelation 7. The chapter shows that human conscience and reason without divine revelation are corrupted by selfishness, so that wrong appears right and right appears wrong, and right must instead be measured by God's law. The verse shows idolaters treating their handmade gods and priests as what they most depend on, with hearts attached to idols rather than to God, and it illustrates the folly of choosing a god one cannot keep.
The verse shows Israel's backsliding and does not mean one can backslide with impunity. It is applied to people who fear that losing their Sabbath would bring ruin, comparing that attachment to the idolaters' concern for their gods and priests.