Review and Herald, Vol. 93, No. 62.
Note and CommentReview and Herald
Review and Herald Publishing Association · Takoma Park Station, Washington, D. C. · Dec 14, 1916
Note and Comment
The Church Question in Politics
Praying for Soldiers and Sailors
The Papacy and the War
The Review and Herald in Our Family
Opening Doors
The Needs of Special Classes
The Shut-ins
The Aged Ones
The Scattered Sheep
Believers in Divided Homes
Anxious Fathers and Mothers
Christmas
“The observance of Christmas is not of divine appointment, nor is it of New Testament origin. The day of Christ’s birth cannot be ascertained from the New Testament, or, indeed, from any other source.”
“The first records we find of the observance of this day are in the second century, about the time of the emperor Commodus.”
“How much the calculation of Hippolytus had to do with the fixing of the festival on December 25, and how much the date of the festival depended upon the pagan Brumalia (December 25), following the Saturnalia (December 17-24) and celebrating the shortest day in the year and the ‘new sun,’ or the beginning of the lengthening of days, cannot be accurately determined. The pagan Saturnalia and Brumalia were too deeply entrenched in popular custom to be set aside by Christian influence. The recognition of Sunday (the day of Phoebus and Mithras as well as the Lord’s day) by the emperor Constantine as a legal holiday, along with the influence of Manicheism, which identified the Son of God with the physical sun, may have led Christians of the fourth century to feel the appropriateness of making the birthday of the sun of God coincide with that of the physical sun. The pagan festival, with its riot and merrymaking, was so popular that Christians were glad of an excuse to continue its celebration with little change in spirit or in manner.”
“The diffusion of Mithraism and of Christianity in the Roman world was from the same direction, at about the same time, and its propaganda, popular rather than philosophic, was carried to the same class of people. In theory, ritual, and practice, Mithraism parodied or duplicated, after a fashion, the central ideas of Christianity. The birth of Mithra and of Christ were celebrated on the same day; tradition placed the birth of both in a cave; both regarded Sunday as sacred.”
“A festival of the Christian church, observed on the twenty-fifth of December, in memory of the birth of Jesus Christ. There is, however, a difficulty in accepting this as the date of the nativity, December being the height of the rainy season in Judea, when neither flocks nor shepherds could have been at night in the fields of Bethlehem.”
“Christmas not only became the parent of many later festivals, such as those of the Virgin, but especially from the fifth to the eighth century, gathered round it, as it were, several other festivals, partly old and partly new, so that what may be termed a Christmas cycle sprang up, which surpassed all other groups of Christian holidays in the manifold richness of its festal usages, and furthered, more than any other, the completion of the orderly and systematic distribution of church festivals over the whole year. Not casually or arbitrarily was the festival of the nativity celebrated on the twenty-fifth of December. Among the causes that coöperated in fixing this period as the proper one, perhaps the most powerful was that almost all of the heathen nations regarded the winter solstice as the most important point of the year, as the beginning of the renewed life and activity of the powers of nature, and of the gods, who were originally merely the symbolical personifications of these.”
The Way to Knowledge
“Here is an apparent paradox. ‘If any man will do his will, he shall know.’ Yes, but our ignorance may center upon the very will we have to do. The will of God itself may be the unknown quantity, and how can we walk the hidden and unknown way? ‘If any man will do his will, he shall know.’ But I must know the will before I can do it; and how if it is just here that the darkness gathers? Surely light must come before achievement, or achievement itself can never be born. And it is just in this difficulty that the Revised Version comes with its gracious aid. In the old version the difficulty is presented with very obtrusive baldness: ‘If any man will do . . . he shall know.’ The Revised Version lays the difficulty to rest. It takes us a step farther back, away to the preparatory conditions before any deed is yet accomplished. ‘If any man willeth to do . . . he shall know.’ Back from doing to willingness to do! We are led from the realm of conduct to the region of character, from finished deed to primary aspirations. ‘If any man willeth to do his will.’ I do not know his will as yet; my feet are stayed; I see no track across the moor. But am I willing to follow the light when the light appears? Are my feet ready to tread the way whenever it emerges clear from the surrounding waste? How sets my will? ‘If any man willeth to do . . .
he shall know.’ And so the primary condition is not a moral act but a moral attitude; it is not initially a finished product but a preparatory mold; not an achievement, but a ‘frame’ of mind by which all achievements are determined. It is not something done, but a readiness to do. ‘If any man willeth to do his will, he shall know.’”
“Our text makes one thing plain, and we shall do infinitely well to hear it; that sunrises are not for those who neglect candles, and that we need never expect to enter into the illumined recesses of sacred truth if the condemnatory light of despised lamps is shining in our rear. ‘If any man willeth to do his will, he shall know,’ and we are pathetically and tragically foolish if we are seeking the knowledge by any other road. The way to firm, fine perception, and therefore to the rich unfolding of truth and glory, is not through metaphysics, or by the towering aspirations of philosophic Babels, but by the humble commonplace road of reverent moral obedience. . . .”
“In our quest for God and truth we must therefore see to it that there are no smoking lamps, and we do this when we firmly set ourselves to do the will we know. There are whole continents of spiritual truth lying back in twilight and night, but there is a fringe of revelation in the foreground, glimpses of our Lord’s will which leave us in no manner of doubt. Let us begin with the will we know, and through it move on to the unknown. But when I say ‘the will we know,’ I mean all the will we know. We are not to choose a candle here and a candle there, and reject and ignore the rest.”