Shared conversation

Biblical Monotheism and the Literal Sonship of Christ

How can the Son have life in Himself if the Father is the only Source?

AdventAI

Is the teaching that the only begotten Son of God is the literal born Son of God prior to all creation in harmony with biblical monotheism in the ultimate sense, in that God the Father is the Source of all being, who alone hath immortality, and that this one God gave to His Son to have life in Himself as stated in John 5:26?

AdventAI

John 5:26

26 For as the Father has life in himself; so has he given to the Son to have life in himself;

AdventAI

Yes, the teaching that Jesus Christ is the literal only begotten Son of God, brought forth from the Father before all creation, is the ultimate expression of biblical monotheism and provides the only true foundation for understanding how the Son possesses the same nature and life as the Father. This truth reveals that God the Father is the absolute Source of all existence, the "one God" from whom are all things, and that He has shared His own essential life with His Son by right of inheritance 1 Corinthians 8:6.

The Father as the Source of Absolute Monotheism

Biblical monotheism is established on the fact that there is "one God, the Father," who alone is supremely and absolutely good, and who alone possesses immortality in an underived, absolute sense 1 Timothy 6:16. He is the "King eternal, immortal, invisible," the Source from whom every other being in the universe, including the Son, derives existence. This does not detract from the dignity of Christ; rather, it honors the Father as the "only wise God" and identifies the Son as the one through whom the Father’s life and power are manifested to the creation Hebrews 1:2.

Understanding John 5:26: Life Given to the Son

The declaration in John 5:26 that "as the Father hath life in himself; so hath he given to the Son to have life in himself" is the definitive explanation of Christ's divinity John 5:26.

  • A Bestowed Equality: This text would be unnecessary if the Son possessed life in the same underived sense as the Father from all eternity; instead, it shows that the Father willed the Son to possess His own infinite power and self-existent life.

  • Original, Unborrowed, Underived: While the Son's life is derived from the Father, it is "original, unborrowed, and underived" in relation to the created universe. To humanity, Christ is the "fountain of life," but to the Son, the Father is the Source of that fountain.

  • The Power to Impart Life: Because the Father gave the Son to have "life in himself," Christ possesses the exclusive power to confer immortality and to raise the dead by His own voice John 5:21, 25-26.

The Mystery of Divine Sonship

To be the "only begotten Son" means that Christ is of the very "substance of the Father" and a partaker of the divine nature in a way that no created being can be.

  • Begotten, Not Created: Christ was not created like the angels, but was "directly begotten of the Father," obtaining a "more excellent name" by inheritance Hebrews 1:4-5.

  • Pre-existence Before Creation: This begetting occurred in the "dateless ages" of eternity, before "anything was made that was made," placing the Son in union and oneness with His Father from everlasting John 1:1-3.

  • The Express Image: As the Son, He is the "express image" of the Father’s person, the only being in the universe who could enter into all the counsels and purposes of God Hebrews 1:3.

Evolution of Understanding

While the pioneers of this movement originally struggled with the definition of the Trinity—often rejecting the traditional views they felt compromised the literal Sonship of Christ—the Spirit of Prophecy has clarified that the Godhead consists of three distinct, co-eternal, and co-equal persons. This unity in "Spirit and counsel" reinforces that the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit work in perfect harmony for the redemption of man, with the Son’s divinity being the believer’s absolute assurance of eternal life. Rejection of the Son's pre-existence or deity is a "dangerous error" that undermines the entire plan of redemption.

Sources · 24
  1. ATO 126.1The AtonementJames M. Stephenson
  2. PTUK December 18, 1890, page 409.4The Present Truth, vol. 6Ellet Joseph Waggoner
  3. SITI February 17, 1887, page 107.5The Signs of the Times, vol. 13Ellet Joseph Waggoner
  4. SITL 23.1The Sabbatic Institution, and the Two LawsJohn Nevins Andrews
  5. ATO 131.1The AtonementJames M. Stephenson
  6. PRL 27.1The Perpetuity of the Royal LawJohn Nevins Andrews
  7. SITI April 8, 1889, page 201.35The Signs of the Times, vol. 15Ellet Joseph Waggoner
  8. TDOC 20.4The Doctrine of ChristWilliam Warren Prescott
  9. Ev 616.2EvangelismEllen Gould White
  10. 5BC 1130.3EGW SDA Bible Commentary, vol. 5Ellen Gould White
  11. ST February 13, 1912, par. 3The Signs of the TimesEllen Gould White
  12. SpTB19 23.1The Spirit of SacrificeEllen Gould White
  13. 13LtMs, Ms 22, 1898, par. 45Letters and Manuscripts — Volume 13 (1898)Ellen Gould White
  14. AMS December 12, 1895, page 389.5American Sentinel, vol. 10Ellet Joseph Waggoner
  15. SITI February 17, 1887, page 107.3The Signs of the Times, vol. 13Ellet Joseph Waggoner
  16. SITI July 7, 1887, page 407.3The Signs of the Times, vol. 13Alonzo Trevier Jones
  17. Ev 615.4EvangelismEllen Gould White
  18. 7ABC 440.4EGW SDA Bible Commentary, vol. 7AEllen Gould White
  19. SSW November 1, 1895, par. 1Sabbath-School WorkerEllen Gould White
  20. 7ABC 437.1EGW SDA Bible Commentary, vol. 7AEllen Gould White
  21. Ev 616.4EvangelismEllen Gould White
  22. DA 530.3The Desire of AgesEllen Gould White
  23. PH148 5.3The Second TitheEllen Gould White
  24. DD 10.1Darkness Before DawnEllen Gould White