Shared conversation
The Original Languages and Preservation of the Bible
Can we still trust the Bible despite centuries of translations?
Paul wrote his letters, what language were they in?
AdventAI
The Apostle Paul wrote his epistles in the Greek language, which was widely spoken throughout the Roman Empire at that time. While the Roman Empire was the political power, the influence of Greek culture and language was dominant and controlling, even in the theological schools and literature of the era.
Language and Audience
The Greek Mind: Paul prepared his epistles specifically to meet the Greek mind, often using their language to address their pride in learning and logic.
Addressing the Heathen: When speaking to the Greeks, such as at Mars Hill or in Athens, he used their language to lead them to a knowledge of the true God through visible works of nature.
Cultural Context: Paul was a debtor both to the Greeks and to the Barbarians, and he fully preached the gospel from Jerusalem unto Illyricum in the common tongue of the day Romans 1:14Romans 15:16-19.
Paul's Usage of Greek
Precision and Meaning: The New Testament was written in Greek, and this language allowed Paul to accurately distinguish between specific concepts, such as identifying the "second veil" in the tabernacle to explain the heavenly sanctuary Hebrews 9:3.
Original Originals: Scholars, such as Martin Luther, applied themselves to the study of Greek specifically to understand the Epistles and the rest of the Word of God in their original tongues.
The Alphabet: The very term "alphabet" is derived from the first two letters of the Greek language, Alpha and Beta, which illustrates how deeply the language of Paul's letters is woven into our own understanding of communication.
Historical and Linguistic Nuances
Comparison to Hebrew: While Moses and the Old Testament prophets wrote in Hebrew, Paul and the other New Testament writers used Greek equivalents; for example, the Hebrew Sheol is equivalent to the Greek Hades used in the New Testament.
The Latin Contrast: Although Latin was the language of the Romans, it was not commonly understood by the Jews in Palestine at that time, making Greek the most effective medium for Paul's widespread ministry.
Linguistic Precision: The Greek language used by the New Testament writers is noted for its remarkable precision, particularly in defining ordinances like baptism and the structure of nouns and adjectives.
Paul’s choice of Greek ensured that his letters, though addressed to specific locations like Rome, Corinth, or Galatia, could be understood by a diverse, international audience.
Sources · 17
- DA 33.2The Desire of Ages
- HBS 50.1Handbook for Bible Students
- SBBS 298.5Source Book for Bible Students
- HBS 43.3Handbook for Bible Students
- SBBS 36.5Source Book for Bible Students
- FACC 271.2Fathers of the Catholic Church
- LP 55.4Sketches from the Life of Paul
- S23D 74.2The Sanctuary and Twenty-three Hundred Days
- LUJ 128.1Looking Unto Jesus
- ST June 7, 1883, par. 1The Signs of the Times
- PBE 18.2The Place of the Bible in Education
- HHMLD 175.1Here and Hereafter
- DAR1909 203.3Daniel and The Revelation
- SUGR 5.3Sunday in the Greek
- PTUK November 14, 1895, page 736.16The Present Truth, vol. 11
- TOB 28.5Thoughts on Baptism
- PTUK June 1, 1893, page 170.14The Present Truth, vol. 9
In what language were the 4 Gospels written?
AdventAI
The four Gospels were originally written in the Greek language, though they contain distinct linguistic influences from the Hebrew and Aramaic backgrounds of their authors. While some traditions suggest an original Hebrew version of Matthew may have existed, the version received as authoritative by the early church and preserved for us was written in Greek.
The Linguistic Style of the Gospels
A Unique Dialect: The Greek of the Gospels is distinct because it was written by men of Hebrew origin; it is neither the style of classic Greek authors nor that of the later ancient Christian Fathers.
Hebraic Influence: While the Gospels abound in classical Greek idioms and compound words, they are also filled with frequent Hebraisms, reflecting the cultural background of the writers.
Accuracy of Nouns: The Greek language allows for precise distinctions, such as using the specific word anastasis to denote a literal resurrection or restoration of life.
Individual Gospel Characteristics
Matthew: Despite controversies regarding a possible Aramaic original, there is no evidence of any text existing other than the authoritative Greek one. Even if Matthew wrote primarily for Jews, they were widely familiar with Greek at that time.
Luke: It has never been doubted that Luke's Gospel was written in Greek, as he specifically addressed Greek readers to present Christ as the perfection of reason and humanity. His writing was intended for a Gentile audience, which is evident in his detailed descriptions of Italian geography for those unfamiliar with the region Acts 27:8Acts 27:12Acts 27:16.
John: The Gospel of John was written in Greek, and it is notable that John used the phrase "the first day of the week" rather than "the Lord's day" in his historical account John 20:1.
Historical and Divine Context
Language of the Spirit: The Holy Spirit is the Author and Inspirer of the New Testament, and the language of the Gospels is considered the language of the Spirit of God.
A World Language: By the time of the New Testament, the "Prince of Grecia" had come, spreading the Greek language to all the nations of the East and making it a universal medium for the gospel Daniel 10:20.
Internal Evidence: The very style and language of the Gospels prove they were written by men living in those specific times, as forgers from later centuries or different cultures would not have been able to replicate such a unique blend of Greek and Jewish elements.
The Consistency of the Record
Equivalency: Though the Old Testament was in Hebrew and the New Testament in Greek, the concepts remain identical; for example, the word for Sabbath differs between the two only because of the language, not because of a change in the institution itself.
Preservation: Ancient manuscripts like the Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus provide us with complete or nearly complete records of the Greek New Testament, confirming the integrity of the Gospels we read today.
Translation History: Great reformers like Wycliffe, Tyndale, and Luther returned to these original Greek texts to bring the fountain of truth back to the common people in their own mother tongues.
Sources · 15
- ARSH September 5, 1865, page 106.10Advent Review, and Sabbath Herald, vol. 26
- SBD Luke Gospel of.3Smith's Bible Dictionary
- SITI August 27, 1885, page 522.4The Signs of the Times, vol. 11
- HBS 332.3Handbook for Bible Students
- ETI Matthew, Gospel according to.5Easton's Bible Dictionary
- SITI January 18, 1883, page 31.1The Signs of the Times, vol. 9
- ARSH November 7, 1865, page 180.24Advent Review, and Sabbath Herald, vol. 26
- PTUK June 13, 1895, page 373.1The Present Truth, vol. 11
- SITI October 1, 1885, page 581.2The Signs of the Times, vol. 11
- SITI December 3, 1929, page 5.3The Signs of the Times, vol. 56
- ETI Sinaiticus codex.2Easton's Bible Dictionary
- GC 80.3The Great Controversy
- GC 245.2The Great Controversy
- GC88 124.1The Great Controversy (1888 ed.)
- HBS 51.6Handbook for Bible Students
When was the first Latin Bible written? Who translated it?
AdventAI
The first Latin translation of the New Testament, known as the Old Latin or Italic version, was made as early as the second century. This ancient translation is considered the earliest version of the original Greek which we possess and serves as critical evidence for the state of the text in that early period.
The Origins of the Latin Versions 📜
The Old Latin (Itala): The initial Latin translations of the Old Testament were not made from the original Hebrew but were a version of a version, being translated directly from the Greek Septuagint.
The Need for Revision: Over time, numerous corruptions crept into these older Latin versions, leading to a state where the ancient text could scarcely be recognized in some books.
St. Jerome’s Commission: In the year 382, Jerome set to work to revise the existing Latin translation to address these corruptions.
The Work of St. Jerome and the Vulgate ✍️
The Translation Process: Jerome completed his work between A.D. 390 and 405, translating the Psalms and other books of the Old Testament directly from the original Hebrew.
The Vulgate: This version, completed around the year 400, came to be known as the Vulgate, meaning the "common version".
Components of the Vulgate: St. Jerome made the Vulgate from a combination of the older Latin, Hebrew, and Greek versions.
Inclusion of the Apocrypha: Jerome also included some of the Apocryphal books, such as the two books of Maccabees which were found in early Latin versions, in his translation.
Historical Significance and Recognition 🏛️
The Council of Trent: In 1546, the Council of Trent declared the Latin Vulgate to be the "authentic" and sole standard Latin version, giving it authority that superseded even the original texts in public disputations.
Papal Revisions: Because of errors in the text, the Vulgate underwent several revisions, notably by Pope Sixtus V in 1585 (issued in 1590) and a corrected version by Pope Clement VIII in 1592 and 1593.
Influence on English Bibles: The first translation of the whole Bible into the English language by John Wycliffe in 1320 was made directly from the Latin Vulgate.
Legacy: By the eighth century, Jerome's work had become the common version in Western churches due to its inherent virtues.
Jerome’s dedication to this task was profound, as he spent years in the Holy Land to acquire a correct understanding of the languages and geography to accurately translate the Holy Scriptures. As Jerome himself stated, "As we accept those things that are written, so we reject those things that are not written" Matthew 23:35.
Sources · 11
- HBS 51.3Handbook for Bible Students
- HBS 48.3Handbook for Bible Students
- HBS 52.5Handbook for Bible Students
- ASC 210.1Analysis of Sacred Chronology
- HBS 323.1Handbook for Bible Students
- RCPKS 29.3Rome’s Challenge: Why Do Protestants Keep Sunday?
- PTUK December 7, 1893, page 566.13The Present Truth, vol. 9
- HBS 377.2Handbook for Bible Students
- SITI December 17, 1929, page 6.3The Signs of the Times, vol. 56
- ARSH September 25, 1860, page 147.16Advent Review, and Sabbath Herald, vol. 16
- SBBS 74.3Source Book for Bible Students
With all of these errors, it feels like I can't trust any translation
AdventAI
It is completely understandable to feel overwhelmed when learning about the history of manuscript variations and the challenges of translation 😌. However, there are very encouraging reasons to maintain full confidence in the Bible you read today.
Core Truths are Preserved 🛡️
- Articles of Faith: While there are many variations in ancient manuscripts, not one of these differences affects an article of faith or a moral precept of duty.
- Consistency Across Versions: The oldest Greek manuscripts, such as the Sinaitic and Vatican codices, teach precisely the same Christianity as the translations used in our English Bibles.
- Abundant Evidence: Any minor variation in the text is usually cleared up by the whole tenor of Scripture teaching, which remains abundantly sustained across all versions.
Divine Providence in History ✨
- God's Intervention: The history of the Bible illustrates the intervention of a particular providence to preserve the purity of the sacred text through the centuries.
- The Fountain of Truth: Even when the Bible existed only in ancient languages, God enabled scholars and reformers to find the fountain of truth so it could be shared with the world.
- God Teaches His Children: As the reformer William Tyndale noted, the same God who teaches the eagles to find their prey also teaches His hungry children to find their Father in His Word.
The Role of the Holy Spirit 🕊️
- The True Author: The Holy Spirit is the Author and Inspirer of the Scriptures, and His work is to lead every sincere seeker into all truth.
- Original Intent: Reformers like Martin Luther applied themselves to original languages to ensure the Gospels and Epistles were opened to the understanding of the people with clarity and power.
- Reliable Guidance: We can trust that as we accept those things that are written, we are following a reliable guide for our lives Matthew 23:35.
You can rest assured that despite the human elements involved in copying and translating, the essential message of salvation and God's will for your life has been divinely guarded for you today 📖.
Sources · 8
- SITI December 3, 1929, page 5.3The Signs of the Times, vol. 56
- ASC 210.1Analysis of Sacred Chronology
- GC 80.3The Great Controversy
- GC 245.2The Great Controversy
- PTUK June 13, 1895, page 373.1The Present Truth, vol. 11
- GC88 124.1The Great Controversy (1888 ed.)
- ST June 7, 1883, par. 1The Signs of the Times
- SBBS 74.3Source Book for Bible Students
But what about the "corruption" that crept in?
AdventAI
While history records that human trustees have at times been frail, God has never allowed His word to be seriously corrupted or any part essential to salvation to be lost. The substance of the sacred text and its general type have been preserved through a particular providence to keep the purity of the message intact.
The Nature of Textual Variations 📜
Doctrinal Integrity: History makes it clear that while variations in detail exist between manuscripts, no fundamental point of Christian doctrine rests upon a disputed reading.
Substance vs. Detail: Although the manuscripts of the Greek Testament, the Vulgate, and the Septuagint differ in many particulars, the truths of Christianity are certainly expressed in all of them.
Providential Preservation: The astonishing integrity of the original Hebrew text, even after many centuries, illustrates the intervention of God to preserve His word.
A Message That Remains Clear 🕊️
Rules for Holy Living: The Lord has revealed in the Scriptures His rules for holy living and the plan of salvation so plainly that none need be ignorant.
The Way of Holiness: The path to heaven is described as a highway where even wayfaring men, though fools, shall not err therein Isaiah 35:8.
Sufficient Knowledge: If you study the Word carefully and prayerfully, you will become wise unto salvation regardless of minor translational differences.
Overcoming the Deception of the Enemy 🛡️
Satan's Strategy: The adversary has untiringly tried to make the world believe the law of God was faulty or needed revising, but his delusive snares will not take everyone captive.
The Safety of the Word: Our only safety is in clinging with unwavering faith to the word of God and shunning whatever that word condemns.
Living Faith: While some may attempt to pervert the Scriptures or use "vain philosophy," those who want meat will find the word of the Lord providing all they need for spiritual life.
You can be of good cheer and courage, for Christ has demonstrated to the universe that God is the Savior of the sinner and has wrought out a salvation that is sure and dependable. The ways of Jehovah are right, and the just shall walk in them Hosea 14:9.
Sources · 12
- SITI December 17, 1929, page 6.8The Signs of the Times, vol. 56
- ASC 210.1Analysis of Sacred Chronology
- RH November 9, 1886, par. 13The Review and Herald
- 8T 78.5Testimonies for the Church, vol. 8
- SpTB19 28.2The Spirit of Sacrifice
- 1MR 45.3Manuscript Releases, vol. 1 [Nos. 19-96]
- ST July 15, 1886, par. 15The Signs of the Times
- HST June 5, 1844, page 138.17The Advent Herald, and Signs of the Times Reporter [Himes], vol. 7
- 19LtMs, Lt 293, 1904, par. 20Letters and Manuscripts — Volume 19 (1904)
- GCB/GCDB 1895, page 301.1General Conference Bulletin, vol. 1
- PTUK July 31, 1890, page 248.2The Present Truth, vol. 6
- 8T 278.1Testimonies for the Church, vol. 8