Review and Herald, Vol. 86, No. 11. (3/18/1909)

Review and Herald

Mar 18, 1909

Review and Herald Publishing Association · Takoma Park Station, Washington, D. C. · Mar 18, 1909

The Fruit of His Love

By Worthie Harris Holden

Worthie Harris Holden

When Love brooded o’er my spirit, Tempest-tossed, by anguish torn, Hope sprang forth at His commandment, Quenching darkness with the morn.

Christ, in love, in His compassion Drew me by His love divine, Till my stubborn will, reposing On His breast, said, “Thou art mine!”

Here I rest, though life hath conflicts,— Rest enfolded in His love, Daily gaining strength and solace From the unfailing fount above.

‘O the joy in Christ, my Saviour! Ne’er I knew what loss was mine When I spurned Him, till, by yielding, I reposed on Love Divine.

More and more, His love revealeth Self and sin in blackest hue, But enshrouded with Christ’s glory, Life is good, since God is true.

Would that all might know my Saviour, Know His love, and share His joy,— Know the fulness of His mercy, Rest, and peace without alloy.

Portland, Ore.

The Protestant Magazine

If you order before May 1, 1909, you may become one of the 24,999 charter subscribers for our new quarterly soon to appear, entitled—

Ready May 1 # The PROTESTANT MAGAZINE Ready May 1

Advocating Primitive Christianity Unlike Other Magazines in Contents and Appearance Protesting Against Apostasy

Yearly Subscription, 25 cents; per copy 10 cents

SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTISTS are the only Bible Protestants in the world to-day. The Roman Catholic Church authorities have repeatedly held us up to the public gaze as “the only body of Christians with the Bible as their teacher,” who observe the Bible Sabbath. The editor of their official organ, after outlining our beliefs, says: “Per contra, the Protestants of the world, THE ADVENTISTS EXCEPTED, with the same Bible as their cherished and sole infallible teacher, . . . have rejected the day named for his worship by God.” See The Catholic Mirror of Sept. 2, 1893.

It seems therefore fitting that Seventh-day Adventists should present to the public such a publication as THE PROTESTANT MAGAZINE.

We believe that every minister, teacher, Bible worker, colporteur, and lay member will find in this new quarterly the very information so long desired, and will in every way rally to its support.

IT WILL TELL YOU What true Protestantism means. Also why and how it came into existence.

IT WILL TELL YOU The difference between genuine and so-called Protestantism. Also why popular Protestantism is dead.

IT WILL TELL YOU Facts hitherto unpublished, showing the exact fulfilment of the Bible predictions concerning “the beast and his image.”

IT WILL TELL YOU Why and when Rome will again rule the world. Also to what extent she is already ruling.

IT WILL TELL YOU The meaning of Rome’s control of political parties, of the great cities of America, of the public press, of public school text-books, encyclopedias, etc.

IT WILL TELL YOU How Protestantism, so-called, is stretching her hands across the gulf to Roman Catholicism,—and why.

IT WILL TELL YOU Which of the contending forces will be victorious. Also how and when the victory will be won.

Special Offer, March 18 to May 1, 1909

During the next 43 days, subscriptions for THE PROTESTANT MAGAZINE will be received as follows:—

5 or more copies, one year, to one address, or to separate addresses, cash with order, ONLY 15 CENTS EACH.

Hasten to send in the names and addresses of yourself and four or more of your friends, with 15 cents for each, and we will do the rest. Send the magazine to business men, clergymen, lawyers, judges, legislators, and other leading thinkers. Send your order to-day.

Address Your State Tract Society, or

THE PROTESTANT MAGAZINE Takoma Park, Washington, D. C.

The Emmanuel Movement

Its Psychology and Its Methods of Treatment

In order that our readers may have clearly before them the psychological theories maintained by Dr. Worcester, the founder of the Emmanuel Movement, and thus be able to make a close connection between them and the methods of treatment, we will present again the summary which was introduced at the close of last week’s article. From the chapters of the book, “Religion and Medicine,” which were contributed by Dr. Worcester, we made quotations which fully warrant us in summing up his teachings thus:—

1. There is in every man a subconscious mind, which is in one place designated as “the strange power of which we have been so long ignorant, though it resides within us, and manifests itself in so many of the most important acts of our lives.”

2. This subconscious mind is “purer, more sensitive to good and evil, than our conscious mind.”

3. “The subconscious mind has more direct control of our physical processes than the conscious.”

4. “Anything which weakens or depresses our subconscious mind exposes us to disease by rendering us less able to resist its encroachments. And on the other hand, we possess such allies and resources within ourselves that, apart from surgical interference, the physician’s chief function is to awaken in his patient the will to live and to employ every element of resistance which the system itself affords.”

5. The subconscious mind “is more generic, and in closer touch with the universal processes of nature, than our conscious intelligence,” and is “in closer contact with the Universal Spirit than reason.”

It follows that the one who can control the so-called subconscious mind can, through such control, have greater power over the physical processes than it is possible to obtain through the operation of the conscious mind, and that the best method of directing the conduct is to eliminate as far as possible the activity of the conscious mind, and having obtained full possession of the will, to impress such instruction upon the subconscious mind as shall afterward be revealed in the life experience.

It appears that these theories of psychology are not peculiar to Dr. Worcester and the Emmanuel Movement, but that they are adopted in a general way by all so-called psychic healers. Their general application in psycho-therapeutics is set forth in an article in the February number of the Fortnightly Review, from which we quote at some length:—

It is precisely in proportion as the therapeutic system or healer, to whom the sufferer resorts, has the power of eliminating the conscious mind, and thus leaving the whole field clear for the recuperative operations of the subconscious mind, . . . that success will be achieved. For it must be remembered that the conscious mind has a twofold inhibitory effect upon restorative operations. It is not only negatively impotent, through its ignorance of the methods by which the subconscious centers perform their work of restoration of diseased tissues, etc., but it has, in too many cases, a positively harmful influence, inasmuch as it is able to suggest to the subconscious centers ideas of disease in conformity with symptoms with which it is unfortunately familiar.

If, then, it is permissible to believe that the conscious mind was not evolved for the purposes of assisting the internal functioning of the body, and that its influence, when directed toward the internal economics, is of an officiously harmful character, when further it is recognized that on the other hand the subconscious mind is, by nature, fully and adequately equipped for purposes of the regeneration of the body and its maintenance in such condition as will best respond to the archetype of the human species, there will follow the admissible corollary that it is precisely in proportion to the degree of elimination of the conscious mind that in the healing of disease success will be achieved. It comes, in short, to this: that the conscious mind can, though, of course, it does not always, cause disease, whilst the subconscious mind can, and generally will, if it is given a chance, heal disease.—Pages 306-309.

It will, perhaps, render these quotations more intelligible to the average reader if we should briefly expound the evolutionary doctrine of which they are the direct outgrowth. The argument runs briefly this way: all living beings, including man, have been evolved from original protoplasm. The lower orders of life, in which the conscious mind is not developed, surpass the higher orders in their ability to repair damages in the physical system. Some, when forcibly deprived of various essential parts of the body, are able to reproduce them; as, for instance, the crab can grow new legs or claws. As in the evolutionary process the higher orders appeared, the subconscious mind was developed, and took charge of the care and repair of the physical

system.

When the process of evolution reached its climax in the development of man with a conscious mind, it assumed, for some reason not stated by these psychological evolutionists, an unfriendly attitude toward the subconscious mind, and through various emotions exercised an unfavorable influence by the constant suggestion of disease instead of health. This relation between the conscious and the subconscious mind is set forth in the same article in the Fortnightly Review in this way:—

The conscious mind was obviously not created for assisting the internal economy of the individual organism to adapt itself to its physical environment—subconscious nature was managing that quite well by herself, before the appearance of consciousness, and nature’s economic statutes prohibit duplication of function.—Pages 308, 309.

It will thus be seen that these theories of psychology, as applied in psychotherapeutics, are based upon the more comprehensive theory of evolution, and that the two must stand or fall together.

Coming now to the practical application of these theories as exemplified in the Emmanuel Movement, we note, first, Dr. Worcester’s statement concerning the control of the subconscious mind:—

The most important fact which has thus been discovered in regard to the subconscious mind is that it is suggestible, i. e., it is subject to moral influence and direction. In this it does not differ from our ordinary consciousness, except that in certain conditions it is more amenable to external control, and it is in closer contact with our physical functions.

One of the conditions favorable to the control of the subconscious mind is “the important matter of confession.” This is clearly stated by Mr. Ray Stannard Baker in his article on The Emmanuel Movement in the American Magazine for December, 1908:—

Before the patient can be successfully treated, he must unburden his soul, must let the minister who is treating him understand to the depths all the sources of his troubles. Without this it is impossible to begin anew, and the very fact that the sufferer can thus unburden himself of his secret troubles and receive sympathetic advice and comfort often starts him on his way toward better living.

This seems to be a part of the general plan by which the patient who seeks the services of a psychic healer has to sink himself, his soul, and his purposes, in the person of the healer, giving to him the fullest possible control of his being. This is further illustrated by the kind of environment provided for the patients, as described by Dr. Worcester:—

I place the man in a comfortable reclining chair, cut off the stream of external sensations by darkening the room and insuring quiet, and I earnestly tell him that in a few moments he will be asleep.

Another practitioner, Dr. Lyman P. Powell, of Northampton, Mass., adopts the same method as is shown in this description of one of his cases:—

The man sat comfortably in an easy chair, the light was turned down, the study was silent and peaceful. Mr. Powell stood behind the chair and told Mr. X to compose himself, that he was going to sleep just as he had gone to sleep before when he had come to the study.

When the conscious mind of the patient has been rendered inactive, and its unfavorable control over the subconscious mind has thus been eliminated, suggestions favorable to health are then made for ten or fifteen minutes in a low monotone to the subconscious mind. We quote one of Mr. Powell’s treatments for alcoholism:—

I told you before that you were not to drink any more. I told you that you could not yield again to the drink habit. You can not drink any more. You will go on now into the perfection of freedom. Your whole physical nature will revolt at the thought of alcohol. If you should take to drink again, it would blast your life, and leave your wife and children without support. It would cost you your position. You are too good a man to drink; you are too fine a character to be ruined by drink. In God’s name I command you therefore not to drink any more. You can not drink any more. You will use every means to keep from drink; you will not be able to drink any more.

If the method already described of eliminating the action of the conscious mind fails in any given case, then hypnotism is employed, according to Dr. Worcester’s own statement:—

Again, in order to deepen the dissociation and to guard against adverse influences, many of the ablest neurologists prefer to give their suggestions through the medium of hypnosis.

Dr. Worcester’s attitude toward hypnotism is frankly stated:—

While I have absolutely no prejudice against hypnotism in safe hands, and while I know its employment to be almost necessary in certain disorders, I doubt very much whether it is necessary or particularly beneficial in the treatment of the ordinary neuroses.

Of the same method of treatment, Mr. Powell gives his view:—

We do not often hypnotize our patients; it is not necessary. Our idea, of course, is to influence their subconscious lives; to replace their hopelessness and moral weakness with suggestions of power and virtue and strength. We do not need to produce a hypnotic sleep, except in rare cases, to reach this end.

In the study of this movement, we have already found that its theology was based upon a pantheistic conception of God, and that it included the essential elements of Spiritualism; we have also learned that its psychological theories are the fruit of evolution, and it now appears that in its method of treatment it is necessary to put the average patient into a semihypnotic state, and in stubborn cases to produce a hypnotic sleep. This gives us a quartette of words with which to define the Emmanuel Movement, namely, pantheism, Spiritualism, evolution, hypnotism. We do not believe that a system to which such labels as these may be legitimately affixed can consistently be regarded as Christian.

The way in which these latest developments of psychology are applied in explaining, according to the demands of modern theology, the experience of Christian martyrs is thus set forth by Dr. McComb, an associate of Dr. Worcester in the Emmanuel Movement:—

So, too, in a measure may we account for the intrepidity, the more than human endurance, with which old men and children, young men and maidens, faced death in the Roman amphitheater in a form so terrible that its mere description turns cold our blood to-day. Auto-hypnotism may well have been the means by which a divine mercy spared them the worst agonies of their fate.

According to this remarkable explanation, the martyrs of all ages, instead of being sustained during the hour of trial by a special grant of divine grace, were made insensible to suffering by hypnotizing themselves. In fact, by this sort of teaching all direct influence of a personal God upon the minds and hearts of men is cut off, and all the experiences of religion are reduced to psychological phenomena. We hope that the conscious mind of believers in divine revelation will be vigorously exercised in repelling such spiritualistic suggestions, and that there may be a body of believers still found on the earth who accept God as a reality, his Word as inspired truth, and his power upon the hearts of human beings as more than a psychological phenomenon.

The views entertained concerning faith by the promoters of the Emmanuel Movement, and their application of it in healing certain forms of disease, are significant and worthy of consideration. We quote from Dr. McComb’s chapter in “Religion and Medicine,” entitled “Faith and Its Therapeutic Power:”—

Religious faith is simply that [or that kind of] trust which the scientist puts in nature and its sequences, which all normally constituted men put in their friends, only now it is extended to the sphere of the unseen, where it becomes trust in the goodness of God, in the divine love as the law of creation.

As to the application of this principle in the system of healing, Dr. McComb writes further:—

What indeed is psycho-therapy at bottom but an elaborate system of suggestion, and what would suggestion avail were it not met with trust on the part of the sufferer? Faith is as necessary in a psychological clinic as at Lourdes or St. Anne de Beaupré. “Confidence,” says Feuchtersleben, “acts like a real force.” Hence it is not so much the quality as the strength of the faith that is of vital moment so far as the removal of a given disorder is concerned. The relic of a dead superstition, a bone from the supposed skeleton of a medieval saint, may achieve as great things in the cure of physical disorders as faith in the living God.

This modern idea concerning faith and its application as a therapeutic agent is also dwelt upon in the article in the Fortnightly Review, from which quotations have already been made:—

Faith is an old-fashioned word, which needs explanation by the light of modern psychological facts. There have been many definitions of faith, but probably the best for our purpose would be that faith is “belief without conscious knowledge.” But belief in what?—Belief in the capacity of some power to bring salvation to body or to soul. It matters not whether that power be supposed to reside in a human being, or a roasted toad carried round the neck tied up in a silk bag. The therapeutic result will be the same. . . . It is true that in a majority of cases this faith is placed in the power of a person or an object that has no power. A live spider worn round the neck in a nutshell can scarcely be said to have power in itself, apart from the condition of mind which it induces, to cure the ague, any more than all the wicked old kings and queens of England and France can be said to have special power to heal scrofulous disease. But the point is that, granted the existence of a power within the organism instinctively capable of repairing injuries and preserving the ideality of the type, it is of small consequence in whom, or in what, the faith of the patient is placed, so long as that faith is strong enough to act as eliminator of the counter-suggestion of the conscious mind that disease is likely to continue. There is then no miracle, but the cure is the most truly “natural” thing in all the world.—Page 311.

According to the views of these new-theology psychologists, faith, instead of being a living principle by virtue of which the power of God is made effective in the individual experience, becomes synonymous with the confidence which one places, either with or without any basis for it, in any person or thing. This is far from that conception of faith which is found in the Scriptures, and is another proof that these modern interpreters of religious doctrine have substituted their own philosophy for that system of Christian truth revealed in the Bible. Not only so, but they even attempt to show that Christ employed these same psychotherapeutic principles in doing his works, and that his miracles are therefore “natural.” The writer of the article in the Fortnightly Review refers to “the great psychical healer Christ,” regards the faith exercised in him for healing as of the same kind already described, and states that “it seems probable that in cases where the principle of faith was lacking, Christ had resort to the natural magnetic healing powers of his own person.” No explanation is offered, however, of the method employed in healing the nobleman’s son (John 4: 46-54), who did not exercise faith on his own part, and upon whom Christ did not lay his hands as the means of applying “the natural magnetic healing powers of his own person.” Neither is the case of Lazarus cited as an illustration of the application of these modern theories of psychotherapy. Evidently another theory will need to be invented to cover such cases as these.

We think sufficient evidence has now been submitted concerning the theology, the psychology, and the methods of treatment of the Emmanuel Movement to furnish a basis for a verdict concerning it. In view of the testimony of its advocates concerning the principles underlying this movement, and their application to the cure of certain classes of ailments, we have no hesitancy in declaring that in the Emmanuel Movement we have a revival of Oriental philosophy, an exploitation of a spiritualistic psychology, and an application of wrong principles concerning the relation of one human mind to another. In this system, the so-called “God-nature within us” takes the place of the true God, human philosophy is substituted for revealed truth, and men are taught so to submit themselves to the control of another human being as utterly to pervert the divine principle of the freedom of the will and its active use in the control of human conduct. Speaking frankly, we regard the theology as heathenish, the psychology as visionary, and the methods as little better than magical incantations.

As to the explanation of undisputed results exhibited in the Emmanuel Movement, we must remember that there is a “god of this world,” who during the present order of things is permitted to exercise a powerful influence in the affairs of this world, even to causing bodily affliction, as in the case of Job; and that it is only the exercise of the constant protecting care of God which prevents daily exhibitions of this malevolent purpose. He who by the use of his permitted power can bring physical trouble, can appear to remedy the trouble by ceasing to exercise that power, and a sufficient explanation of such a course may be offered if by this restoration to normal health a greater and more permanent control is really gained over the life of the individual. As throwing further light upon this matter, we call attention to the fact that the only forms of disease treated by these psychotherapeutic healers are what are classified as functional diseases, being chiefly those in which the condition of mind appears to have a most powerful influence over the physical system. It was by direct control of the mind yielded to his specious suggestions that Satan, in the form of the serpent, secured his present power over the human family enthralled by sin. It is through the same channel that he works most effectively at the present time to maintain his usurped dominion over the same human family weakened through generations of indulgence in sin.

In this connection, it seems appropriate to quote a statement made by Mrs. E. G. White, and reported in the General Conference Bulletin of April 6, 1903, page 87:—

You know that Satan will come in to deceive if possible the very elect. He claims to be Christ, and he is coming in, pretending to be the great medical missionary. He will cause fire to come down from heaven in the sight of men, to prove that he is God.

Further reference may be made from time to time to the Emmanuel Movement, which already is reported as having spread to at least seventy-five churches in this country, but the consideration already given to it in this series of articles will, we hope, enable our readers to arrive at an intelligent conclusion concerning the claims of this movement and its interpretation of the gospel of Christ.

Editorial

By Editor

The test of whether we know God is our attitude toward his holy law. Says Inspiration: “They profess that they know God; but by their works they deny him, being . . . disobedient, and unto every good work reprobate.” Titus 1:16. Says Jesus to some who profess to know him: “I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.” Iniquity is the transgression of God’s law. If we desire to meet him in peace, to be known by him and accepted by him when he comes, how essential that we sustain the right attitude toward that law vindicated by our Saviour in his life before men and in his death upon the cross.

Quiet Communion with God

God is a God of peace. His ways are not found in the paths of discord and strife. He does not come with blare of trumpets or in show and ostentation. Quietly and all unseen to the natural vision, he speaks to the waiting, trusting heart of his child. He says, “Be still, and know that I am God.” It is profitable to cultivate quietness. It is profitable to meditate quietly upon God’s goodness and his providences in our lives, to throw open the soul to the divine influences of his Holy Spirit. At these quiet seasons God will speak to us as he did to Elijah, and we shall come to know that even when shut in from human companionship, we may experience sweet and satisfying communion with God. “It is good that a man should both hope and quietly wait for the salvation of the Lord.”

Too Late

By W. A. S.

It is easy for anybody now to see that God led in the exodus movement. Yet all the way from the Red Sea to Jordan there were murmurers and doubters. And men rose up to lead those elements into rebellion and apostasy.

Suppose, for example, that in the thirty-eighth year of the journey, some element of evil had risen up, finding fault with the way in which the movement had been led, and proposing a new exodus movement. Any child of faith in Israel would have replied that no true exodus movement could be begun in the wilderness, or at that late date.

Nearly a generation before, according to God’s promise and prophecy, the time for the exodus movement had come, and the Lord was leading his people on. Except for his leadership and mighty deliverances, even the disaffected would have known not so much as that there was any exodus movement. They would have been back in Egypt, making bricks, instead of along with the people of God, on the borders of Canaan.

We can see plainly enough that the very exodus movement that came out of Egypt went into the land of promise. Those who clung to it, went in with it. Those who were true to God were never called out from it, but the disloyal and unbelieving separated themselves from it. The experiences of Israel “happened unto them for ensamples: and they are written for our admonition, upon whom the ends of the world are come.”

Now and then some disaffected element

has arisen in connection with the advent movement, repudiating the past experience and leadership of God in the message, and proposing to call out a new movement. But the suggestion comes too late. If this be not the true movement, it is too late for the true one to rise. The true advent movement, which John saw in vision doing the appointed work and triumphing in heaven, was to rise when the hour of God’s judgment came, nearly a generation ago. At the right time this movement rose; it is giving the message foretold, and flying swiftly through to every nation and tongue; and the people carrying the message keep the commandments of God and the faith of Jesus, and have the testimony of Jesus. Not a word has failed that God has spoken aforetime concerning the rise and progress of the movement. Now, with the time of the latter rain and of the shaking come, and with the message rising to a loud cry in many lands, we know that the journey of the advent people is nearly done. The “blessed hope” grows brighter all the way.

W. A. S.

God and Our Rights

By C. M. S.

God has always recognized the rights of his creatures. Even though he made the mind, and the creature it controls, he has neither fettered nor forced it. The result of disobedience to moral law was bound to be ruinous and terminate in death. So, as a loving Father, he has faithfully warned of the consequences, while leaving the creature free to choose obedience with blessing and with life, or disobedience with the resultant curse and death.

The service which God desires is the service of love; for it is only such service that honors him. Such service is that which the loyal angels render, and which will be rendered throughout the entire universe of God when the conflict with sin is ended. The free will choosing the way and the service of God brings joy to heaven and glory to the Creator; and in that there is all of peace, joy, harmony, and blessed union. The wrong choice, our will perverted and hardened by selfishness, has ushered in all of turmoil, sorrow, discord, and separation.

Because of the result of choice, God warns, admonishes, and urges every human being in these words: “I call heaven and earth to witness against you this day, that I have set before thee life and death, the blessing and the curse: therefore choose life, that thou mayest live, thou and thy seed; to love Jehovah thy God, to obey his voice, and to cleave unto him; for he is thy life and the length of thy days.” Deut. 30:19, 20. Though spoken first to the liberated bond-servants of Egypt on the border of the promised land, these words are for every human being of this generation so near the borders of the eternal kingdom. The same requirements which the Lord placed upon them in the way of loyal, loving service, he places upon us. The choice is before us as truly as ever it was before them, and God did not require of them in this matter what he does not require of us.

While Israel was still halting in Moab, waiting for the order to go over and possess the land, this special message from the Lord was given to the people through Moses: “See, I have set before thee this day life and good, and death and evil; in that I command thee this day to love Jehovah thy God, to walk in his ways, and to keep his commandments and his statutes and his ordinances.” Deut. 30:15, 16. The world was not keeping those commandments; the people that did honor them were an outcast people; and the God who gave them, had been dishonored by the nations.

Israel’s inheritance in the Holy Land was but a type of the inheritance of the faithful Christian in the redeemed possession of the new earth, our Redeemer’s eternal kingdom. Likewise Israel’s entrance into that land was typical of the entrance of the faithful child of God into the promised home land of the redeemed. What God placed before the waiting congregation of Israel, he places before his waiting people now. They who, in the days of Moses and Joshua, accepted the requirements laid upon them by Jehovah in the keeping of his commandments, had the right to go over Jordan and enter into possession of the country promised to Abraham more than four hundred years before. And they took that law with them, to be the rule of their life in the land of their heritage. It went before them down into the waters that had walled them out, and it impounded those waters until the people had passed over.

But the days of literal Israel are over, and antitypical Israel waits on the border of the antitypical promised land. It is in this period of expectancy that we hear our Redeemer saying to his people: “Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city.” Rev. 22:14. The blessing of Israel’s God went with Israel of old in the keeping of the commandments as they entered the promised land, and our Lord couples his blessing likewise with the keeping of the commandments by those who are ready in the end of the age to enter the eternal city. Israel’s acceptance of that requirement made it possible for the ark of God with the law of God within to open a gateway for them where none had been before. So the attitude of God’s people in the last generation of earth will make it possible for him who sits “between the cherubim” to lead the redeemed hosts of this earth “through the gates into the city.”

God had set apart Palestine for a people who were to be his nation. His law was to be the rule in that nation. The people who took that law for the rule of their life had the right to enter there. The home of the redeemed furnishes a parallel here also. The psalmist says: “All thy commandments are truth. Of old have I known from thy testimonies, that thou hast founded them forever.” Ps. 119:151, 152. There is no question, then, that those commandments, or testimonies, are to be the rule of conduct in the home of the redeemed. That law is the standard of righteousness. It is the “righteous nation” that is to “enter in.” The possession of righteousness is the passport to the kingdom. That is why Inspiration says: “The righteous shall inherit the land, and dwell therein forever.” Ps. 37:29. Who are the righteous? “Harken unto me, ye that know righteousness, the people in whose heart is my law.” Isa. 51:7. The people who keep the law are called by Inspiration the righteous. It is “the righteous”—who have the law in their hearts—that are to “inherit the land, and dwell therein forever.”

It is they, then, who accept the law of God as the rule of their lives, in whose hearts that law is written, and whose lives conform to its precepts, that are to be given the right to enter the home of the redeemed, just as in the case of Israel of old the right to enter was contingent upon the proper attitude toward the law of God. It was to rule in Palestine, and they who accepted it were given the right to enter. It is to rule in the earth made new, and they who are loyal to its precepts will take it with them over into that eternal realm of righteousness and peace. Having taken an attitude of loyalty toward the law of the realm of glory, they “have a right” to become subjects of that realm. God recognizes the right, and the reapers of earth’s harvest, the angels of God, are sent forth “with a great sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other.” Matt. 24:31. Of that small but victorious company it is said by him who redeemed them: “Here is the patience of the saints, they that keep the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus.” Rev. 14:12.

God set before Israel life and death, the blessing and the curse, and told them to choose. The choice they made was determined by their attitude toward the law of God. The right attitude conferred upon them the right to enter the land and the right to an inheritance in it. It is just so with us. His great law

separates between those who are his and those who are not. “He that turneth away his ear from hearing the law, even his prayer is an abomination.” Prov. 28:9. It needs hardly be said that none will enter the kingdom of God whose very prayers are an abomination to Jehovah.

God sets before us life and death, the blessing and the curse, and tells us to choose. We, like Israel, indicate the choice we make by our attitude toward his law. If we make it a yoke, an enemy, and reject it, our choice does not give us a right to “enter in through the gates into the city.” God has no portion other than death for those who do not enter there. To oppose and reject the law, then, is to make that terrible choice which shuts us out of heaven. We turn the key upon ourselves that bars us out from the presence of our Redeemer. It is a fearful choice to make; but we can not blame God for the result. He has told us to choose; and we have thrown away heaven because of our antipathy toward the law of him who is our King, the ruler of heaven. Out of harmony with the law of the realm, we will have no right there.

How different is the result when we take the position of David: “Then shall I not be put to shame, when I have respect unto all thy commandments.” Ps. 119:6. “I will delight myself in thy statutes.” Verse 16. “I will run the way of thy commandments, when thou shalt enlarge my heart.” Verse 32. “Give me understanding, and I shall keep thy law.” Verse 34. That attitude confers rights in the kingdom of God, and God respects those rights—rights even to come to the tree of life, which Adam lost through sin.

This is not to make men their own saviors through the doing of the law; but Jesus Christ can not take men and women into the kingdom of glory whose hearts are at enmity with the law of that kingdom. If men would choose heaven, they must choose the law of the Ruler of heaven. When they do that, Jesus Christ can save them. Until they do, there is no power nor process by which it can be done.

C. M. S.

The Christian’s Home Life

By F. M. W.

THE Christian will ever manifest due consideration for the rights of others. By a spirit of kindness and gentleness, he will prove that the power which rules his life is from above. Perhaps the most practical demonstration he will give of this will be in his own home. Here restraint, in a measure, is thrown aside. He associates daily with those whom he knows intimately, and with those who in turn know him. What he may say or do the world as a rule will know little about. He can act with little restraint.

Then, too, it is the little things of life which are the test of character, and the home is the place where these little trifles must be dealt with. In the home some of the greatest failures in Christian experience are witnessed. Many men and women who have met and conquered some of the great trials, have gone down to defeat before some of the little things of life. Jealousy, faultfinding, and impatience have done their evil work. Little by little faith has lost its power, and hope its brightness, and the soul has been turned away from God.

In God’s purpose the home should be made a citadel of strength and power in the life of every one of its inmates. The exercise of love and tenderness, of confidence and mutual regard, of courtesy and consideration, will weld together the hearts of parents and children, and make them beat in unison in their daily association and in their plans and purposes. The home should be a place of rest and refuge, of glad and happy reunion and communion, for every member of the family circle. In such a home God will dwell, around it the holy angels will linger, and from it will go forth an influence strong for truth and right. F. M. W.

Continue reading: Note and Comment