Signs of the Times, Vol. 41, No. 29.

The Future of Our Earth
Earlier text: The Future of Our Earth

England in Seething Ferment

Army Organized, Equipped with Guns, and Trained, in Violation of Law — Men of Powerful Influence back of the Movement
A Counter-Catholic Army — Labor Organizations Combining with Threat of Armed Resistance
The Government in Perplexity and Powerless
By W. T. BARTLETT Special Correspondent, London, England
It was often said, a year or two ago, that there was no excitement in the country over giving home rule to Ireland, that the issue had lost all the interest it possessed in Mr. Gladstone's day. No one has talked that way during the past few months. We have been passing through a succession of dramatic crises, of hairbreadth escapes for the government, of sudden and striking developments.
At the present writing, the bill is safely through the House of Commons, and is now, in company with an amending bill, under the consideration of the House of Lords. The peers can not do anything more with the original bill; but they may prolong the controversy in the parliamentary arena by raising a fresh contest over the government's amending bill, and out of this stage of the proceedings no one can tell what fresh surprises may spring.
If the government, however, is able to hold its own against the various forces that are working for its downfall, the bill must, in the course of a few weeks, receive the royal assent, whatever course the lords may take.

Sir Edward Carson and His Army

The Irish difficulty began first to wear a formidable appearance when Sir Edward Carson organized the Ulstermen into a volunteer army, sworn to resist to the death the authority of any nationalist government that might be established in Dublin. Still, no one knew what this really amounted to. In the north of Ireland everybody was certain that it meant civil war if the Ulstermen were driven to that extremity; but elsewhere people were inclined to think that when it came to cold steel and gunpowder, Sir Edward Carson's army would melt away.

Many Army Officers in the Plot

The situation took on an altogether different aspect when the fact was discovered that many officers in the regular army sympathized with the cause of the Ulstermen and would resign rather than bear arms against them. Through the maladroit handling of the problem at the war office, the kingdom was thrown into a ferment over the crisis that was supposed to have arisen. Was parliamentary government to be subordinated to the army, or was the army the servant of the government?
Mr. Asquith carried his cabinet safely through this crisis by taking up himself the office of secretary of state for war; the former secretary, Colonel Seeley, having felt compelled to resign his office.
For a few days the excitement in the country was intense. Bitter things were said in the most public way about the king, who was supposed to be behind the army revolt, encouraging an attitude of refusal to coerce Ulster, if coercion should be deemed necessary. Mr. Asquith explicitly cleared the king from this suspicion, but it was still repeated in certain quarters.

The Government Seems Helpless

The next step in the drama was the famous gun-running exploit of the Ulster volunteers, who managed to defy the forces of the crown, and, in spite of the vigilance of the navy, land a large cargo of guns and ammunition near Belfast. The government talked in dignified language about dealing appropriately with the authors of the outrage, but nothing was done. Mr. Asquith seemed to be weakly making one concession after another to the opposition, without satisfying them in the least, allowing them to talk sedition publicly without check or hindrance, taking no steps to punish the open infraction of the proclamation forbidding importation of weapons and ammunition.
What could be the explanation of this supine policy, unless the prime minister knew that he was powerless to enforce law and keep order, by reason of a wholesale military defection?

Catholics of Ireland Arming Too

Thus events drifted along for a while, and then a new phenomenon appeared. Suddenly England awoke to the fact that the nationalists of the south and west of Ireland had also been raising a volunteer force, which had grown to be one hundred and twenty thousand strong, and bade fair in time to reach three hundred thousand. Included in this body of men were thousands of old soldiers and officers. The Irish question had assumed still another aspect. All Catholic Ireland was rising in arms. The Ulstermen were likely to be many times outnumbered if it came to a contest. The men of Ulster themselves recognized the change that had taken place. The specter of armed resistance had called forth another specter. Force was to be met with force.
Photograph by Paul Thompson. CAMP OF VOLUNTEERS ORGANIZED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF SIR EDWARD CARSON. OBSERVE THAT THE MEN ARE DRILLING WITH REAL GUNS.
Photograph by Paul Thompson. CAMP OF VOLUNTEERS ORGANIZED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF SIR EDWARD CARSON. OBSERVE THAT THE MEN ARE DRILLING WITH REAL GUNS.
The result is that just now public opinion is calling on all sides for an amicable settlement. The question is not so much, What will England grant? but, What attitude will armed Ireland take? The two forces may amalgamate, it is thought. They are expected to form the nucleus of a territorial army under a new national government. The Irish parliamentary party has succeeded in obtaining control of the nationalist volunteer force, and has thereby been powerfully reinforced as a commanding factor in the controversy.

An Object-Lesson to Labor and a New Peril

Mr. Asquith's government is still, however, traveling a perilous road. As I write, there is doubt as to whether they will receive the support of the labor members over certain questions that arise on Mr. Lloyd-George's latest budget. That gentleman has brought forward fresh proposals for the further taxation of the wealthy classes, and is as usual the object of their strenuous hostility. Some wealthy members of his own party seem not unwilling that his career in this direction should receive a check. The relations between the labor party and the liberal government have not always been close and friendly of late. The two parties are frequently in conflict in by-elections.
The labor members in the House of Commons have demanded again and again why it is that Sir Edward Carson and his friends can make seditious speeches, and arm themselves in open defiance of law and government proclamation, while working men must conform strictly to the law or go to prison. Some of the labor members have given notice that they and those whom they represent are taking note of the license granted to wealthier offenders, and that no government need ever expect again that hungry strikers will show such a submissive and law-abiding spirit as they have usually manifested in the past. They see that others depend upon threats and force, and find these the most successful methods; and henceforth they also will rely more on the same weapons.

The Most Ominous Ever Known

We are likely to see, before long, how much this intimation means. Three of the largest groups of unions in the country, representing the miners, the railway men, and the transport workers, have lately amalgamated. These three organizations together have a membership of about 1,500,000; and all three of them intend to present demands early next year, simultaneously, for a considerable increase in wages. Unless the demands are granted to all three, simultaneous strikes will be ordered, and in that case the country will be face to face with an industrial crisis such as it has never before had to meet.

The Militant Desperadoes

The sex war continues with unabated ferocity. Here also the agitators seem to rely on nothing but force for the accomplishment of their purpose. The militant suffragettes have been successful in committing a considerable amount of damage lately without detection. Old parish churches have been burned to the ground, disturbances have been created in places of worship, and even the royal court has not been exempt. At a recent reception, a lady of good position attempted to address the king on the subject of "votes for women."
A bomb was exploded in Westminster Abbey, and a portion of the coronation chair, on which every king of England sits at his enthronement, was shattered. Public opinion has been greatly exasperated by this continuance of outrages, and many suffragettes have fared ill in their open-air propaganda.
The militants made a great mistake one Sunday when they attempted to disturb the worship in two well-known Roman Catholic churches. Catholics have no scruples about employing the arm of flesh. The congregation promptly set upon the offending militants and treated them roughly. One of the suffragettes was just escaping in a cab, when she was dragged out by one of the indignant women of the congregation, and soundly beaten before she was allowed to depart.
The government thinks that in time it will wear down the movement by means of its "cat and mouse" act; and it declines to allow the militants to die in prison of starvation, although much urged thereto whenever they adopt the hunger strike. The government is hoping to proceed by legal process against wealthy supporters of the militant movement, and obtain large compensation from them for damage wrought.

Impending Break-Up of Civilization

It will be seen, from the foregoing, that one need not look very long in this country for signs that indicate the danger of an impending break-up of civilization, and a return to comparative barbarism, unless some strong influence shall operate upon the existing confusion and restore order and tranquillity. There is a chorus of lamentation on all sides that we are fast reverting to paganism.
Philip Snowden, M. P., himself a prominent socialist, speaks thus of the outlook:
"It is obvious to every one that we are approaching one of those historic epochs of revolution when, either by peaceful movement or violent change, the old order must give place to the new. There is a real danger that unless the true lessons of the labor and social unrest are understood, and unless wisdom and experience are brought to bear on the treatment of the problems involved, blind ignorance, class hatred, and a burning sense of injustice on the one side, and on the other, fear of the dispossession of property and the loss of social position, may lead to violence, bloodshed, and inconceivable suffering."

Anglican Church Too Weak for the Situation

It is the special function and privilege of the church, many acknowledge, to act as a moderator at such times as this, and impose, by a supernatural authority, its controlling will on popular passions. But the church is, at the present time, in no position to speak with authority. Its own ranks are divided between those who still hold its creeds and charters to be valid, and those who have criticized these almost out of existence.
Bishop Gore, a few weeks ago, published a demand that a firm hand be exerted by the episcopate of the Anglican church to exclude from its ministry those who have ceased to respect its standards of doctrine. To the general surprise, the challenge was taken up by Professor Sanday, who has been regarded in the past as a pillar of orthodoxy, but who now expresses the opinion that the critics have not been answered, and he fears, can not be. This unexpected declaration has greatly strengthened the critics, and startled those who would still like to cling to the Bible.

Rome Sees Reason for Her Advancement

The organ of the Roman Catholic Church sees in the circumstance another welcome evidence that the Church of England is breaking up, and asserts that the Church of Rome will soon be left as the one champion of the Christian faith. This is what it says on the present situation:
"Every man believes what is good in his own eyes. There are creeds and standards, but criticism has wrought havoc upon both. What the rust could not devour, the moth destroys. . . . No church can abandon tradition and Scripture and creed, and live as a church. The choice is fast becoming this: Criticism or church? And unless all the signs of the times bewry us, we shall see, in the days approaching very quickly, that where there is no pope there is no church, no Christ. The world will lapse, is speedily lapsing, into paganism, from which it may be the lot of the Catholic Church, centered in the see of Peter, to restore mankind once again, and build up the temple of Christ on the corner-stone of the pope. Who crushes error, saves truth. Who will save truth, must crush error. There seems to be in Europe to-day no power except the papacy capable of preserving the doctrines of Christianity and maintaining belief in Christ."—Catholic Times, June 19, 1914.

Roman Church Is Jubilant

The Roman Church is jubilant over the prospect that unrolls before its vision. With religion disintegrating in England, and home rule about to be realized in Ireland, why should it not hope for a revival of its ancient power in the United Kingdom? I quote from the same journal just mentioned, the issue dated June 12, as follows:
"Ireland is mostly Catholic. In the years to come, under home rule, the fact of so many Catholics in Ireland being in the government of that country will certainly influence the counsels of England. It is scarcely possible to conceive of a gross injustice being done to English Catholics while such numerous Irish Catholics are so near. No doubt we shall have to fight our own battles, but we shall not fight without friends. And if, united in England, and befriended in Ireland, we can not prove ourselves to be a match for any attack on our religious or educational life, the fault will be our own."

Defeated a Sunday Bill

A bill for the enforcement of Sunday observance came before the House of Commons a few weeks ago, and was thrown out by 117 votes to 105. This is a setback to the Imperial Sunday Alliance, which has been working very hard for the passage of Sunday legislation. But the alliance does not intend to drop its efforts.
The Irish members did not favor the bill, on the ground that Ireland would prefer to deal with such matters in her own parliament, soon to be set up; and the alliance hopes that when the imperial Parliament is reduced in size by the withdrawal of the bulk of the Irish representation, this bill can be brought forward again with better success.

Din of War Throughout Europe

The din of war preparation still resounds throughout Europe. France is in trouble over the three years service law, and no ministry that stands for the strict enforcement and maintenance of this act can at present obtain a working majority in the French Chamber.
Russia and Germany face each other with greatly increased forces, and animated by a bitter spirit, which is allowed to find frequent expression in the press of each country. In the course of the next three or four years, the peace establishment of Russia will be raised to about 1,700,000 men, or almost double that of Germany.
The recent German attempts to secure an overwhelming preponderance in armed strength have only succeeded in raising up against her on both frontiers vastly larger armies than she before confronted. The other countries of Europe outside these mighty rivals are not exempt from the obsession that condemns them to waste their substance on fevered preparations for a day of slaughter.

Armaments Increasing Everywhere

Dealing with the state of Europe, the Times recently said: "Austria steadily adds to her effectives on land, and is committed to an ambitious and costly naval program, which is already paralleled, and will probably be surpassed, by that of Italy. The Balkan States are borrowing as much as they can get, and are organizing special forces — for example, the twelve divisions of Servia — as fast as their state of exhaustion permits. Spain has plans for an army of 450,000 men and a field army 21,000 strong. Sweden is developing her defensive preparations. The Netherlands, hankering after Dreadnoughts, are also busy with their coast defenses, and expect higher expenditure upon their field army. Finally, Belgium is working up to a field army of 178,000 men. Look where we will, armaments are growing, and there is no symptom anywhere of a change of course."
England is also to be privileged to play her full part in this most discordant "concert of Europe." Says the same writer: "The great sacrifices made by France and Russia to obtain this balance can not leave us unmoved. We can not reasonably expect to enjoy for long the advantages of association with any great military states — and not the least advantage of such association is the preservation of peace — without making constant effort to support, when necessary, diplomacy by arms."

A Veritable Reign of Paganism

Look where one will to-day, he sees evidences that we have entered upon a veritable reign of paganism. In the craze for pleasure, the immodest dress of so many women, the appeal to violence, the arming of the nations, the embittered struggle between capital and labor, the decay of religion, we witness traces of the growing influence of the powers of darkness.
True Christianity in this world is still a pilgrim and a stranger, and he who looks for a reign of peace and righteousness need never hope to see it here below. Only one development can set the crown to the work begun by Jesus of Nazareth, and that is His promised return to destroy the works of sin, and set up His own glorious and everlasting kingdom.

Adroitly Working for a Sunday Law

Seeking to Initiate a Measure to Be Voted on in California This Fall Apparently Innocent, but It Is Religious Legislation

By J. W. McCord
POLITICS and religion make strange bedfellows. One belongs to the earth, earthy, while the other professes to belong to God. Yet how much alike they become in character and conduct when they enter into alliance!
Just such a union took place in the fourth century, between the emperor Constantine and the church fathers, and grievous indeed were the results. To-day the clergy and the barbers of California have decided to pool their interests in order to establish a Sunday law in this free state.

WHY THIS UNION?

The Rev. Mr. Crafts and the Rev. Mr. Tufts, of the National Reform Association, have long tried to secure a Sunday law in California. The barbers' union likewise has tried to close the barber shops throughout the state on Sunday.
On May 25 the writer interviewed the secretary of the barbers' union of San Francisco, in order to learn the real facts relative to their proposed Sunday law. The secretary informed me that their union had already obtained 30,000 names, and that they were hard at work trying to secure another 10,000, which would give their bill a place on the ballot next November.

CHURCH FEDERATION BACK OF IT

He further informed me that eight or ten other unions were behind them in this campaign, and among their supporters are to be found the church federation. To back up his statement that the church federation stood behind the barbers' union in this fight, he showed me a letter from the federation, signed by its chairman, Dr. Aked. The substance of this letter is as follows: "The church federation is behind you in this campaign. If you care to address the federation at the Y. M. C. A. for ten or fifteen minutes, you may do so. If not, you must bring the matter before the churches in any way you please. You may use this letter if you so desire."
I asked the secretary for some literature on the subject, and he referred me to the Rev. Mr. Tufts, of Oakland, who is one of the leaders of the "national reform" movement in the state of California. However, I was able to secure a copy of the proposed Sunday law, and also their written instructions to those who are seeking to obtain names. In this carefully printed instruction, the circulators are told to "inquire of Methodist, Presbyterian, or other pastor in your city for the address of 'central headquarters' of your county."

ONLY ONE DAY IN SEVEN ASKED

The bill to be presented to the electors next November provides for one day in seven as a day of rest. In reality the bill mentions only one day by name, and that day is Sunday. This is mentioned seven times in the bill. Evidently that is the only day the barbers and the clergy desire as the day of rest. This of course makes the bill both illogical and dangerous.
Not much knowledge of history is required for a person to understand that a bill which provides for religious legislation, and arrays class against class, is indeed a dangerous bill. The barbers' bill would create needless trouble between barbers that employ help, and barbers that are employed. It would also cause much bitterness in other trades. I use the word "needless" in this connection, because there is no need whatever for this bill. One day in seven has already been granted by the state; and this state law, so far as I could learn, is scrupulously followed by most of the barbers.

THE BOYCOTT

For several years, the barbers' union has been very dissatisfied with the state law which provides for one day's rest in seven in every trade. In 1908 the San Francisco barbers' union compelled the barber shops to close at noon on Sunday. This plan would have continued but for the firm of Ruge and Gast, who kept their barber shop open all day Sunday. Then the barbers' union resorted to boycott and picket, and for twelve months this recalcitrant barber shop was picketed. During this prolonged siege, the firm added chair to chair, and to use the words of Mr. Gast, "it was picketing that made business."
Having failed in its attempt to close Ruge and Gast, the barbers' union was forced to change its constitution in order that union shops also could keep open on Sunday and thereby save their trade.
The barbers' union now hope that the time is ripe to obtain a state law, and thus secure, by the aid of sheriffs, what this union could not obtain by the picket and boycott.

BARBERS' UNION ONLY A CATSPAW

It is self-evident that the church federation is using the barbers' union merely as a catspaw to bring into operation an oppressive Sunday law. Compared with other Sunday closing bills, the present bill is somewhat mild, so much so that certain ministers refused to back it.
However, the voters of California must not be deceived; for in spite of its mildness, this bill has dangerous potentialities.
In sections three and four a penalty is provided in the shape of fine or imprisonment. This bill also provides for a system of espionage in order to obtain a conviction. Therefore if it becomes law, those who work on Sunday, unless they are exempt, willstand a good chance of going to jail. Thus this mild bill has in solution all the objectionable features of the most drastic Sunday laws on record.

DO NOT VOTE YOURSELF INTO JAIL

If this bill becomes law next November, the voters of California will have placed on the statute-book a potential Sunday law. However, the ministerial authors will not be satisfied with so slight a victory as this bill would afford. No; the present bill has been framed by them merely as an "entering wedge"; and when the wedge takes hold, they will drive it home by taking away all the exemption clauses.

"Shall Not Do Iniquity"

Promise of a Glorious Condition — The Last Generation in Which Sin Will Rule

By A. R. BELL
"The remnant of Israel shall not do iniquity, nor speak lies; neither shall a deceitful tongue be found in their mouth: for they shall feed and lie down, and none shall make them afraid." Zeph. 3:13.
This is a condition of things most glorious to contemplate. What would it mean if this state of affairs should obtain in all the world with all men?

HUMAN RIGHTS WOULD BE RECOGNIZED

It would mean that man would find his true relation to his fellow, and occupy it. The great doctrine of human rights would then be recognized by all. Religious and civil bigotry and prejudice, world-wide, would cease.
In the industrial world, it would mean that the master and the man would bury the hatchet forever. Labor and capital would find their true level. Strikes, lockouts, and labor troubles would be no more. There would be no more the massing of wealth, and keeping pace with it "a deepening and deadening poverty."
In the political realm, it would mean that diplomacy — local, state, national, and international — which develops the gentleman plunderer and the polite cutthroat, and which has been truly called "the art of lying," would be an unnecessary profession.

VIRTUE WOULD SUPPLANT VICE

And what would it mean in the social world if none should do iniquity? — It would mean that vice would give way to virtue. The home and the family would be the most sacred ties of earth. The slaying of the unborn would be no more, and the respectable married murderess would have passed from the stage of action. Purity in private and public life would rule. The cesspool of a world's iniquity would be transformed into a veritable garden of Eden, and men would love the good. There would be no more lying lips, no more deceitful tongues.
A glorious state to contemplate, truly! For the day-dream socialism, which so many to-day believe to be the only healing of the world's wounds, there would be found no place.
But what a contrast to all this contemplation are conditions as they are — wickedness, lawlessness, and apostasy everywhere, and alarmingly on the increase; and so far as human sight can penetrate into the future, there is no hope.

WHERE WE ARE LIVING

We are living amid the closing scenes of earth's history. Every prophecy of the Bible that treats of the second coming of Christ focuses upon this generation, fixing it as the last; and of this generation, which shall not pass until the Lord in glory is revealed, the Saviour Himself has said, "And as it was in the days of Noe, so shall it be also in the days of the Son of man."
Texts could be multiplied, but this one is sufficient, revealing, as it does, conditions prevailing when the Son of man comes, which conditions are everywhere present.

YET THE GLORIOUS CONDITION WILL BE REACHED

But in spite of all the sin and wickedness, in spite of all the rottenness of earth, the scripture we have been considering is held up before us of God, and gladdens the heart of every believing soul.
In the everlasting glory of the kingdom of God, all that we have contemplated here will be realized. Gladness and rejoicing will take the place of sorrow and mourning.
The Lord will be in the midst of His redeemed people. We read, "The King of Israel, even the Lord, is in the midst of thee: thou shalt not see evil any more." Zeph. 3:15. And further: "The Lord thy God in the midst of thee is mighty; He will save, He will rejoice over thee with joy; He will rest in His love, He will joy over thee with singing." Verse 17.
The Lord hasten the day!

Can God Be Baffled?

Is It Possible for Him to Save a Man Against His Will?—Can All Be Saved Who Desire It?

By CALVIN P. BOLLMAN
THIS is a question that is agitated to some extent from the standpoint of the Universalist argument that "since omnipotence can not be baffled, and since God would have all men to be saved, all men must of necessity be saved."
The reasonable, the logical, and the all-sufficient reply to this so-called argument is that the Bible nowhere tells us that God has willed that all men shall be saved. On the contrary, the Bible does tell us that many men will be lost, not because God so wills, but because they themselves so will.
Salvation consists primarily not in escaping hell-fire, but in escaping sin. The angel's words to Joseph concerning his wife were, "She shall bring forth a Son, and thou shalt call His name Jesus: for He shall save His people from their sins." Matt. 1:21.
"The wages of sin is death." Rom. 6:23. The only salvation promised in the Bible is, first, salvation from sin; and secondarily, from the wages of sin. But salvation from sin itself is fundamental. Man can escape the wages of sin only by first escaping sin. It follows that he who refuses to be saved from sin can not hope to escape the wages or penalty of sin.
God is omnipotent, yet there is one thing which even He can not do. He can not deny Himself. 2 Tim. 2:13. God must be true to His own nature and to the principles of the government which He has ordained. He created man a free moral agent. He can not violate that freedom of choice without denying Himself and impugning His own wisdom. It is for this reason that God can save only those who will to be saved not only from the wages of sin, but from sin itself, its power and guilt as well as its penalty.
We think altogether too much of being lost at some point of time in the future. The fact is we are lost now unless, because we have willed to be saved from sin, the Lord has saved us, and is saving us moment by moment, from the dominion of sin. "God sent not His Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through Him might be saved. He that believeth on Him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only-begotten Son of God."
Mark you, man is not condemned primarily for his unbelief; but since the world was already in sin, and since the Son was sent to save from sin, those who reject the proffered salvation remain in that state of condemnation, or in that lost condition. God could and did give up His Son to die, "the just for the unjust," that He might save us from sin; but God can not surrender His own righteousness. He can not cease to be what He is.
The principle may be illustrated in this way: A man falls overboard from a ship in mid-ocean. So far as his ability to help himself is concerned, he is lost when he falls. He may swim for a short time, possibly for an hour or even more; but unless he receives help from some source, he must drown. But the life-buoy is thrown to him, the ship puts about, and a rope is let down. If he refuses the proffered aid, he perishes, not because he fell overboard, but because he refuses to be saved.
The ocean into which we have fallen is sin. If we remain in it, we shall perish. The rope that is thrown out is the merit, the victory, and the power of our Lord Jesus Christ. Faith is the hand that grasps this life-line, and the great Captain Himself lifts the believer out of sin and into righteousness. But the sinner who refuses or even neglects to grasp the line that is thus thrown to him, can no more be saved than can the man be saved who, falling overboard from an ocean liner, refuses the life-buoy and disdains the rope cast to him by those who are anxious to rescue him from a watery grave.

Mark Twain's Estimate of the Bible

THE following paragraph taken from one of Mark Twain's note-books is worthy to be classed with some of the finest and most helpful things that have ever been said about the Bible:
"It is hard to make a choice of the most beautiful passage in a book which is so gemmed with beautiful passages as the Bible. Who taught those ancient writers their simplicity of language, their felicity of expression, their pathos, and, above all, their faculty of sinking themselves entirely out of sight of the reader and making the narrative stand out alone and seem to tell itself? Shakespeare is always present when one reads his books; Macaulay is present when we follow the march of his stately sentences; but the Old Testament writers are hidden from view."
Continue reading: BAPTISM; ITS MEANING AND ITS FORM